[WSBARP] boundary dispute settlement

[HOWARD HERMAN]

See RCW 58.17.040 (6)  A lot line adjustment is the only way to sever a piece of land from one lot and add it to an adjoining lot. An easement does not transfer title and a deed standing alone would create another tax parcel which is not allowed. Check with your county planning department for the procedure. And yes, a survey is required.


 

Howard Herman

509 220 5810

 

 

 

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Gregory L. Ursich
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 9:22 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] boundary dispute settlement

 

No; do not shortcut, need the survey to make the boundary line agreement valid. -Greg Ursich, Inslee Best

Sent from my iPhone


On Oct 21, 2015, at 5:52 PM, Matt Johnson <Matt at gravislaw.com> wrote:

All, 

 

I represented a party in a boundary dispute, OP has capitulated and accepted that my client is the rightful owner. Initially, OP agreed to split the cost of a survey, filing, and boundary dispute agreement for filing pursuant to RCW 58.04.007. 

 

However . . . after the estimate was received OP has decided not to split the costs and my client does not want to pay for it alone. 

 

Does anybody have any creative ideas on how to memorialize the settlement of a boundary dispute without a survey that would be binding upon successors to the properties and would show up in the property index? 

 

 

Matthew R. Johnson| Attorney at Law

Gravis Law, PLLC

P.O. Box 182 | 350 E. Main St. 

Dayton, WA 99328

509-382-2030 (office)
 <https://www.gravislaw.com/> Website - LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/matthew-r-johnson/2b/997/87a> 

 

NOTICE:  This email (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (EPCA), 18 U.S.C., Sec. 2510 - 2522, is confidential and privileged.  This email is solely for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above.  Receipt by anyone other than the individual recipient(s) is NOT a waiver of attorney-client privilege.  Any violation of the ECPA is subject to the penalties stated therein. If you have received this message in error, please notify me immediately by reply e-mail to  <mailto:matt at gravislaw.com> matt at gravislaw.com and immediately delete the original message.

 

_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20151022/07b37202/attachment.html>