[WSBARP] Form 21 - no express language re payment of REET

[Paul Neumiller]

Maybe this is one of those "custom and practice" allocations that depends on
where you live?  

 

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Eric Nelsen
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 2:20 PM
To: WSBA Real Property listserve (wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com)
Subject: [WSBARP] Form 21 - no express language re payment of REET

 

I've noticed this before, but now I'm motivated to ask about it. NWMLS Form
21 -- the standard residential PSA -- does not expressly say that Seller
shall pay the real estate excise tax. It is in fact Seller's tax burden per
WAC 458-61A-301(1)(b)
<http://app.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=458-61A-301> , and I know
that's how it gets paid as a matter of course.

 

Now a client is wondering why it's not expressly stated. Is there a reason
why it's not stated explicitly in the PSA?

 

Sincerely,

 

Eric C. Nelsen

SAYRE LAW OFFICES, PLLC

1320 University St

Seattle WA  98101-2837

phone 206-625-0092

fax 206-625-9040

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20150701/ad4a88ed/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Paul Neumiller.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 1612 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20150701/ad4a88ed/PaulNeumiller.vcf>