[WSBARP] WA "Anti-SubLease Clause" - Does it "VOID" the Lease K?

[Victor R]

Members:

Any of you run into this 'problem'?  Where a Lessor writes in a Clause that
the lease agreement is NOT SUBLEASE-'ABLE' ?

Another Hypo is:  Owner Rents-Out to Lessee / Lessee Rents-Out to
Sub-Lessee but says "Sub-Lessee, YOU CANNOT Lease Out That Office I am
leasing to you!"

What is the CURRENT case law on this?

What WAS the current case law on this, and SINCE WHEN?

I am trying to size up any potential litigation on this matter.

Thank you, a bunch.

Kindly,



-- 


Victor Ro, Esq.
THE RO FIRM, P.S.C.
A Professional Services Corporation
5400 Carillon Point
Bldg. 5000, 4th Floor
Kirkland, WA 98033
Tel:  (206) 319-7072
Fax: (206) 319-4470

This communication is CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT - PRIVILEGED.
You are responsible for any damages arising in any way from its use.  Do
not construe this correspondence or contents, thereof, as legal advice or
as an engagement between an attorney and client.  If you received this
communication in error, delete it immediately and permanently from all
existing files.  NOTICE and PROHIBITION:  Do not copy, transmit,
retransmit, distribute, or disclose this information contained, herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20150128/6a01631b/attachment.html>