[WSBARP] Long-Term Adverse Possession

[Paul Neumiller]

The standard/usual burden of proof falls on the party who is claiming real
property through adverse possession.  It is my vague recollection that there
is a doctrine that says that if the use of the real property is long-term,
the burden falls on the party resisting the adverse possession to prove that
there is no adverse possession.  That is, long-term adverse possession
shifts the burden of proof from the "claiming" party to the "resisting"
party.  I can't find that doctrine now.  Anyone able to point me in the
right direction?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20150429/4d785259/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Paul Neumiller.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 1612 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20150429/4d785259/PaulNeumiller.vcf>