[WSBARP] quiet title action against ????

Eric Nelsen Eric at sayrelawoffices.com
Tue May 13 11:31:17 PDT 2014


I agree with Paul; still need a basis for adverse possession for the
statutory period. It sounds like this is not the situation where a road is
vacated and attaches by law to the neighboring properties.

 

Kinda related but really just an excuse for a story--I did some research a
few years back on an "unclaimed land" issue. The law seems to allow a
straight land grab--whoever possesses it first wins. It appears to be
technically possible for a trespasser to win an ejectment action against
someone who attempts to enter after them. "Superior title" wins, and a
party can't win based on the weakness of the other party's title, so the
second trespasser should lose to the first.

 

Sincerely,

 

Eric

 

Eric C. Nelsen

SAYRE LAW OFFICES, PLLC

1320 University St

Seattle WA  98101-2837

phone 206-625-0092

fax 206-625-9040

 

 

 

From: wsbarp-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbarp-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Paul Neumiller
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 11:09 AM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: RE: [WSBARP] quiet title action against ????

 

This is shooting from the hip but I looked at this issues about ten years
ago.  The problem you have with the quiet title action is that your client
probably has no colorable claim to the land at this time as the basis for
the quiet title action.  (What is your client going to say to the judge,
“I’m grabbing this land because no one else is”?) My initial analysis was
that my client, basically, had to expand out to the land and then bring a
quiet title action based on adverse possession after 10 years.  

 

 

 

From: wsbarp-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbarp-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Josh Grant
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 10:33 AM
To: wsbar real property
Subject: [WSBARP] quiet title action against ????

 

I have a client who owns land bordering a platted street and he wants
title to 1/2 of the street.  This is interesting because the plat was
never recorded.  All of the deeds etc in this whole plat have been by
meets and bounds descriptions, followed by "commonly known as lot 1... of
unrecorded plat".  I discussed at length with the local title company who
finally said "we can't find anyone of title on this 7 1/2 foot wide strip
of land".  The county doesn't show anyone is an owner, doesn't tax it, it
has no parcel number.  The title examiner said that there are no title
companies in the county that has a plant that goes back far enough to find
some ancient owner.  The title examiner said he has gone over this with
the county assessor and they have no records showing any previous owner
either.  The examiner said he would sign a declaration that there is no
record owner.

 

Given the above, I am unclear as who the defendant in the quiet title
action should be.  The title examiner said that if we list "members of the
public" and get a decree quieting title that he thought it would be
insurable (but that isn't binding on anyone).  The neighbor, according to
the title company has no interest in this property (they apparently got a
deed to the other half of the unrecorded but platted street).  "members of
the public" and "anyone claiming title" are the only defendant(s) I have
thought of.

 

Any ideas on who to list? from the list?

 

thanks

 

Joshua F. Grant
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 619
Wilbur, WA 99185

 

t 509 647 5578
f 509 647 2734

 

 

===============================
- To contact the list administrator, send a message to:
<mailto:webmaster at wsbarppt.com> webmaster at wsbarppt.com 

 

- To unsubscribe, send a new message to: imail at lists.wsbarppt.com, with
the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe wsbarp - OR - send a
message to webmaster at wsbarppt.com asking that you be removed from the
wsbarp list. 

Information provided on this list should not be considered legal advice.
As with all lists - let the reader beware! No warranties or
representations are made as to the accuracy of any information provided.
All opinions and comments in this message represent the views of the
author and do not necessarily have the endorsement of the Washington State
Bar Association nor its officers or agents. 

===============================
- To contact the list administrator, send a message to:
<mailto:webmaster at wsbarppt.com> webmaster at wsbarppt.com 

 

- To unsubscribe, send a new message to: imail at lists.wsbarppt.com, with
the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe wsbarp - OR - send a
message to webmaster at wsbarppt.com asking that you be removed from the
wsbarp list. 

Information provided on this list should not be considered legal advice.
As with all lists - let the reader beware! No warranties or
representations are made as to the accuracy of any information provided.
All opinions and comments in this message represent the views of the
author and do not necessarily have the endorsement of the Washington State
Bar Association nor its officers or agents. 

===============================
- To contact the list administrator, send a message to:
webmaster at wsbarppt.com 


- To unsubscribe, send a new message to: imail at lists.wsbarppt.com, with
the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe wsbarp - OR - send a
message to webmaster at wsbarppt.com asking that you be removed from the
wsbarp list. 

Information provided on this list should not be considered legal advice.
As with all lists - let the reader beware! No warranties or
representations are made as to the accuracy of any information provided.
All opinions and comments in this message represent the views of the
author and do not necessarily have the endorsement of the Washington State
Bar Association nor its officers or agents. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 31975 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20140513/a7b92784/winmail.dat>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list