[SPAM] Re: [WSBARP] Asking for an express easement when a prescriptive easement appears to already exist

Wed Apr 9 15:36:56 PDT 2014

How about if you phrase it as a settlement offer or quit claim deed?

<http://rdclasslegal.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/DarrinClassLogo_SML.jp
g> 

PO Box 173
Ridgefield WA 98642

Washington 360-953-4148/Oregon 503-208-5789
darrin at rdclasslegal.com

This message and any files transmitted with it contains information
intended for the specified individual(s) only. This information is
confidential, may be privileged, and is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2510-2521, or otherwise protected by
law. If you are not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
copying, or the taking of any action based on the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by
mistake, please advise the sender by e-mail reply, and delete it from your
system.

Tax Advice Notice: IRS Circular 230 requires us to advise you that, if
this communication or any attachment contains any tax advice, the advice
is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
avoiding federal tax penalties. A taxpayer may rely on professional advice
to avoid federal tax penalties only if the advice is reflected in a
comprehensive tax opinion that conforms to stringent requirements. Please
contact the sender if you have any questions about Circular 230. 

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, David Faber <david at faberfeinson.com>
wrote:

Good afternoon,

I have a client who is seeking an easement across two adjoining pieces of
property, each owned by a different person. The easement is for a dirt
access road and is only necessary because he needs to be able to insure
his access point (in other words, the servient properties aren't trying to
block the access road, nor have they even said anything to my client about
his use of the land). My client has been using the road for over 40 years,
and the elements of a prescriptive easement appears to have been easily
met long ago. However, for the sake of judicial economy and to prevent
unnecessary acrimony, I am thinking of counseling my client to seek an
express easement from his neighbors. My concern, however, is that by
taking this step the court *might* consider this an admission by my client
that he doesn't consider the hostility prong to have been met. I know
that, if a prescriptive easement exists, it has likely existed for 30+
years, and therefore him requesting an express easement now should have no
impact on his established prescriptive easement. Because proving hostility
vs. permissive can be somewhat difficult, however, is it possible that
requesting an express easement might undermine my client's claim that a
prescriptive easement exists?

Best,
David J. Faber
Faber Feinson PLLC
210 Polk st., ste. 4B
Port Townsend, WA 98368
(360) 379-4110 <tel:%28360%29%20379-4110> 

*** NOTICE: ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION - PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL.
This communication may contain privileged or other confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you
have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy,
retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please
indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in error,
and destroy the copy you received.***
===============================
- To contact the list administrator, send a message to:
webmaster at wsbarppt.com 

- To unsubscribe, send a new message to: imail at lists.wsbarppt.com, with
the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe wsbarp - OR - send a
message to webmaster at wsbarppt.com asking that you be removed from the
wsbarp list. 

Information provided on this list should not be considered legal advice.
As with all lists - let the reader beware! No warranties or
representations are made as to the accuracy of any information provided.
All opinions and comments in this message represent the views of the
author and do not necessarily have the endorsement of the Washington State
Bar Association nor its officers or agents. 

===============================
- To contact the list administrator, send a message to:
webmaster at wsbarppt.com 

- To unsubscribe, send a new message to: imail at lists.wsbarppt.com, with
the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe wsbarp - OR - send a
message to webmaster at wsbarppt.com asking that you be removed from the
wsbarp list. 

Information provided on this list should not be considered legal advice.
As with all lists - let the reader beware! No warranties or
representations are made as to the accuracy of any information provided.
All opinions and comments in this message represent the views of the
author and do not necessarily have the endorsement of the Washington State
Bar Association nor its officers or agents. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 7670 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20140409/84a2325b/winmail.dat>