<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
I love and highly commend to every practicing lawyer this set of provisions: <a id="LPlnk618914" href="https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=64.28&full=true">
https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=64.28&full=true</a>. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
Note carefully that certain of these refer to not just real property but to personal property. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
I quite literally re-read them every now and again merely to remind myself that no matter how complicated others (such as financial institutions or redundant acronyms like JTWROS) make these issues, JTs have survivorship without the redundant (if "communicative")
phrase "with right of survivorship".</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
And then recently the Idaho Court of Appeals had occasion to clarify effectively these same points in a case in which a party argued a joint tenant had no survivorship without the four quoted words above. (It is a smart opinion, even if some of my fellow Idaho
lawyers have twisted themselves in circles misreading the court to have said the common law is entirely irrelevant, when the court said no such thing. Rather the court said, as perhaps this RCW does, that the statute (of course) controls, including where it
derogates the common law, but that where the statute is silent, the common law may well "fill the gap" and provide the answer. A perfectly unexceptional proposition to my mind.)</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
I hope this helps. Best, Josh </div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com> on behalf of Mark Anderson <marka@mbaesq.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, August 11, 2025 2:19 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt@lists.wsbarppt.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [WSBAPT] Joint Tenancy v JTROS</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<style>
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math"}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos}
@font-face
{font-family:"Arial Narrow"}
p.x_MsoNormal, li.x_MsoNormal, div.x_MsoNormal
{margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:10.0pt;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;
color:#071320}
span.x_EmailStyle17
{font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;
font-variant:normal!important;
color:#002060;
text-transform:none;
top:0pt;
letter-spacing:0pt;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;
vertical-align:baseline}
.x_MsoChpDefault
{font-size:11.0pt}
.x_MsoPapDefault
{margin-bottom:10.0pt}
@page WordSection1
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in}
div.x_WordSection1
{}
-->
</style>
<div lang="EN-US" link="#467886" vlink="#96607D" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="x_WordSection1">
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="color:#002060">Dear All:</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="color:#002060">Husband and Wife own an investment account identified as " Husband & Wife JT TEN." Is there any distinction to be made between this and</span> "<span style="color:#002060"> Husband & Wife JTROS”? In other
words, does a joint tenancy always result in a right of survivorship?</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="color:#002060">Thanks.</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span style="color:#002060">Mark B. Anderson<br>
</span></b><span style="color:#002060">ANDERSON LAW FIRM PLLC<br>
821 Dock Street, Suite 209, PMB 4-12<br>
Tacoma, Washington 98402<br>
+1 253-327-1750<br>
+1 253-327-1751 (fax)<br>
<a href="mailto:marka@mbaesq.com"><span style="color:#002060">marka@mbaesq.com</span></a><br>
<a href="http://www.mbaesq.com/" originalsrc="http://www.mbaesq.com/"><span style="color:#002060">www.mbaesq.com</span></a><b></b></span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-family:"Arial Narrow",sans-serif; color:#002060">CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE<br>
</span></b><span style="font-family:"Arial Narrow",sans-serif; color:#002060">This transmission is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual named recipient. It may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine,
or other confidentiality protection. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, be advised that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received
this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender via e-mail or by telephone at (253) 327-1750 that you have received the message in error, and then delete it. Thank you.</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>