<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Script MT Bold";
panose-1:3 4 6 2 4 6 7 8 9 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Thanks for this.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Script MT Bold";mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Script MT Bold";mso-ligatures:none">Diane J. Kiepe<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none">Douglas Eden, P.S.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none">717 W. Sprague Ave., Suite 1500<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none">Spokane, WA 99201<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><a href="mailto:djkiepe@depdslaw.com"><span style="color:#0563C1">djkiepe@depdslaw.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none">509-455-5300<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-ligatures:none">KINDLY ALLOW 2-4 WORKING DAYS TO RECEIVE A RESPONSE TO NON-URGENT EMAILS. FEEL FREE TO SEND YOUR EMAIL (OR RESEND YOUR EMAIL AS THE CASE MAY BE) MARKED URGENT IN THE
SUBJECT LINE.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-ligatures:none">DISCLAIMER: the preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by law, the attorney-client privilege or other privilege. This communication
is intended to be private and may not be recorded or copied without the consent of the author. If you believe this message has been sent in error, REPLY to sender and then DELETE this message. Thank you. </span><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="mso-ligatures:none">From:</span></b><span style="mso-ligatures:none"> wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Philip N. Jones<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, October 4, 2023 1:09 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt@lists.wsbarppt.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBAPT] level of distrust/animosity of PR reason for removal<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">I have spent a lot of time researching and thinking about the ability of a beneficiary to seek removal of a trustee due to an alleged conflict of interest.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Although most of my research has been in Oregon, I believe that the rule is generally the same in Washington. In short, I believe that a mere conflict of interest is not
a valid ground for the removal of a trustee. For example, I would be permitted to serve as the PR of my mother’s estate even though my primary job is to divide the estate equally among me and my seventeen sisters. That presents a conflict, but not one that
would justify my removal.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">The
<i>Hamlin</i> case, cited below, was an unpublished opinion reversing a lower court’s granting of a motion for summary judgment. Of course, an order granting summary judgment is often (and easily) reversed, because all the appellant needs to do is raise an
issue of material fact. And the <i>Hamlin</i> opinion did not remove the trustee; it merely held that a trial should be held to determine whether the alleged conflict (and the alleged actions of the trustee motivated by that conflict) were sufficient to justify
removal. Maybe they were. Maybe they weren’t.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Attorneys are not allowed to have conflicts. But fiduciaries can.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">In short, I believe that there is a relatively high bar for trustee removal, and the mere existence of a conflict does not rise to that level.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Below is some research I did for a CLE talk on this subject. Your mileage might vary.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Phil Jones
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_Hlk142492491"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> A conflict of interest on the part of the trustee is not necessarily grounds for removal. For example, oftentimes the trustee is also one of several beneficiaries of the
trust, as pointed out by the comments to ORS 130.655. The Third Restatement of Trusts, §37, Comment f(1), states:</span></a><span style="mso-bookmark:_Hlk142492491"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-ligatures:none"><o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_Hlk142492491"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="mso-bookmark:_Hlk142492491"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Thus, the fact that the trustee named by the settlor is one of the beneficiaries of the trust, or would otherwise have conflicting interests,
is not a sufficient ground for removing the trustee or refusing to confirm the appointment. This is so even though the trustee has broad discretion in matters of distribution and investment.<o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_Hlk142492491"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_Hlk142492491"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> Also, there is a "strong statutory and common law preference to defer to the designation of a personal representative made by the testator."
<i>Holst</i>, 117 Or App 307, 311 (1992). <o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_Hlk142492491"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_Hlk142492491"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> However, in some cases the conflict of interest is so fundamental that removal of the fiduciary is warranted.
<i>Wharff v. Rohrback</i>, 152 Or App 68, 73-74, 952 P2d 87 (1998). In the <i>Wharff</i> case, one of the duties of the personal representative was to consider suing herself for causing the wrongful death of the decedent. The court held that the personal
representative should be removed because that conflict was sufficiently substantial to justify removal. In
<i>Vander Galien v. Vander Galien</i>, 47 Or. App. 233 (1980), the mother of the decedent was appointed as personal representative after mistakenly representing to the court that the decedent did not have a spouse, who would have had preference for appointment
under ORS 113.085. In addition, a conflict of interest was present, or was likely to be present. The court held that a combination of the conflict and the error in the appointment of a non-preferred person justified the removal of the personal representative.
In <i>Faulkner’s Estate</i>, 156 Or. 23 (1937), <i>Elder’s Estate</i>, 160 Or. 111 (1938), and<i> Bean v. Pettengill</i>, 57 OR. 22 (1910), the personal representative was removed because a conflict was present between the personal representative and the estate,
due to the personal representative’s misappropriation, concealment, or fraudulent transfer of estate assets. When those factors were not present, and the alleged conflict was less substantial, the Court of Appeals declined to remove the personal representative.
<i>Roley v. Sammons</i>, 215 Or. App. 401 (2007). See also <i>Schaad v. Lorenz</i>, 69 Or. App. 16 (1984).<o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<span style="mso-bookmark:_Hlk142492491"></span>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-ligatures:none">Philip N. Jones<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-ligatures:none">Duffy Kekel LLP<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-ligatures:none">900 S.W. Fifth Ave. Suite 2500<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-ligatures:none">Portland, OR 97204<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-ligatures:none"><a href="mailto:pjones@duffykekel.com">pjones@duffykekel.com</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-ligatures:none">(503) 226-1371 – office<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-ligatures:none">(503) 853-1482 – cell<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-ligatures:none">(503) 226-3574 - fax<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="mso-ligatures:none">From:</span></b><span style="mso-ligatures:none">
<a href="mailto:wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a href="mailto:wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Shannon Jones<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, October 4, 2023 11:01 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <<a href="mailto:wsbapt@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbapt@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBAPT] level of distrust/animosity of PR reason for removal<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:30.2pt;line-height:24.0pt;mso-line-height-rule:exactly">
<span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">As relates to a fiduciary (trustee):<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:30.2pt;line-height:24.0pt;mso-line-height-rule:exactly">
<span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">A Trustee may be removed and a successor appointed for reasonable cause, which may include a conflict of interest between the trustee beneficiary and other trust beneficiaries. See RCW 11.98.039 and also
<u>Waits v. Hamlin</u>, 55 Wn.App. 193, 776 P.2d, 1003 (1989). A court has discretion to remove a trustee on the ground that bad will or ill feeling between the trustee and the beneficiaries would be detrimental to execution of the Trust. See
<u>Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Ctr v Holman</u>, 107 Wn.2d 693, 732 P.2d 974(1987).</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-ligatures:none"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="mso-ligatures:none">From:</span></b><span style="mso-ligatures:none">
<a href="mailto:wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a href="mailto:wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Diane J. Kiepe<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, October 4, 2023 10:55 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv' <<a href="mailto:wsbapt@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbapt@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [WSBAPT] level of distrust/animosity of PR reason for removal<br>
<b>Importance:</b> High<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Hello –
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">I feel like someone once shared that bad blood is a reason for removal of PR – if I am remember right, I am hoping someone can share that case with me.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Script MT Bold";mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Script MT Bold";mso-ligatures:none">Diane J. Kiepe<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none">Douglas Eden, P.S.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none">717 W. Sprague Ave., Suite 1500<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none">Spokane, WA 99201<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><a href="mailto:djkiepe@depdslaw.com">djkiepe@depdslaw.com</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none">509-455-5300<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-ligatures:none">KINDLY ALLOW 2-4 WORKING DAYS TO RECEIVE A RESPONSE TO NON-URGENT EMAILS. FEEL FREE TO SEND YOUR EMAIL (OR RESEND YOUR EMAIL AS THE CASE MAY BE) MARKED URGENT IN THE
SUBJECT LINE.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-ligatures:none">DISCLAIMER: the preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by law, the attorney-client privilege or other privilege. This communication
is intended to be private and may not be recorded or copied without the consent of the author. If you believe this message has been sent in error, REPLY to sender and then DELETE this message. Thank you. </span><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ligatures:none"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>