<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">I’ve found it common and put language to that effect in my probate orders. No human interacts with the bank or touches checks anymore. They want to know either is sufficient. <div><br></div><div>John J. Sullivan<br><br><div dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On Mar 4, 2021, at 10:01 AM, Candace Wilkerson <cwilkerson@wongfleming.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Listmates,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Has anyone else run into this, and if so, how did you deal with it? I absolutely despise Bank of America; every time I do a probate and the client wants to work with them, we have a new hoop to jump through. (Note: I told my clients to
go to another bank or credit union to open the account, but don’t know if they will.)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">My clients, who are Co-PRs of the estate, told me that BOA needs to have something in the Letters (or maybe simply the order appointing them, they weren’t clear) stating that they can act independently on the account, otherwise BOA won’t
open an estate account for them.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">I have done multiple estates with co-PRs, and never had a bank require this. They just assume that the co-PRs can act independently regarding the account.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Is it common practice to add this language in the order of appointment? As it is, I will have to go back and file a motion. But if BOA requires adding it to the Letters themselves, I’m sure that won’t fly.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Any thoughts would be appreciated.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Candace Wilkerson<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<span>***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***</span><br><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>WSBAPT mailing list</span><br><span>WSBAPT@lists.wsbarppt.com</span><br><span>http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt</span></div></blockquote></div></body></html>