<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">This is the procedure I've used on both sides of the cause:</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">The first step is to file a petition under RCW 11.68.070, which must be supported </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">by an affidavit making a prima facie showing of cause for removal.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">The Court then cites the PR to appear before it and answer your claims under </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">RCW 11.28.250. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">You do bring it under the Probate cause number and if you don't follow RCW </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">11.68.070, your petition can be dismissed.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="text-indent:48px"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:41 AM Candace Wilkerson <<a href="mailto:cwilkerson@wongfleming.com">cwilkerson@wongfleming.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US">
<div class="gmail-m_-1945940960186914367WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">My last petition to remove a PR was filed under TEDRA as a new case. I thought that’s what was required because it involved a dispute between PR and beneficiaries, but Eric makes a good argument. I’d love to know the consensus.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Candace Wilkerson<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a href="mailto:wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Eric Nelsen<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, October 7, 2020 9:51 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <<a href="mailto:wsbapt@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbapt@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBAPT] Questions about a citation hearing to remove naughty Administrator<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I take it you are proceeding under <a href="https://url.emailprotection.link/?bSkzP_sdmuv9qvewZ1yXXW7IPAh8wclbQvh0Ap_dtBgt2HPaYpQVSIArJW1zE_FeShEnnnA9uDVTYg-KBbW9EyloVcd_5bAA5JEqzVMjcZ2Q7loDHK3BuCQQwp00KjPi26DTUQX_jiT6hmpo9xOeOA_EmFTBFhkTfdt066oKN-1M~" target="_blank">
RCW 11.28.250</a>? If the PR has non-intervention powers, I would strongly suggest using actual service of process on the PR, even if you mail notice to everyone else. Regardless of what the statutes appear to say, there are potential jurisdictional issues
if a PR has been granted NPs, unless personal service by a process server is accomplished. Since you can eliminate any jurisdictional argument by using process service, I think it's the better tactic.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">My <i>current</i> opinion regarding removal of a PR under that statute, is that a motion to remove the PR is not a TEDRA "judicial proceeding" that requires filing a petition under a separate cause number, as mentioned in
<a href="https://url.emailprotection.link/?bvIX_f-gE7OUp65_hmP4MPD5sIs9MoSFQ42s50wVQ7mT0X8Mr6i2kix5dvJl1XykgzwaGvmUjeOi0W4EKGZ4xctnODJ0Gwb53IdBlN7-d-H3hPXmnnpZ1HpRf0aXBMcxGSBQmNj07VE7CE8htn9zeqY8effBWrV7Z-wY24_lfEhA~" target="_blank">
RCW 11.96A.090</a>. Removal of a PR does not seem to be within the scope of the definition of "matters" resolved by TEDRA, under
<a href="https://url.emailprotection.link/?bvIX_f-gE7OUp65_hmP4MPO2pGNcnNW7FB0JC1Y17ZjwUQQQzxOsJ_vGMKC23thMNxIU4Kplbfz_yxRLMrdDLDe19sZmjgXwJadIFs2ZxXb-xuo7GfN_CfI4FDgjiqftklIMXy4TwNumisOZVu7Fn2pZpezJrzrFCN-y4NXhZSO4~" target="_blank">
RCW 11.96A.030(2)</a>. I think that the motion is filed under the probate cause number. This makes the most sense to me as a matter of "logic" in that the court proceedings removing a PR really ought to be in the same case caption that appointed the PR; but
then again, logic doesn't always govern.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Does anyone else think differently—that removing a PR requires filing a separate TEDRA action?<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sincerely,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eric<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eric C. Nelsen<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sayre Law Offices, PLLC<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">1417 31st Ave South<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Seattle WA 98144-3909<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">206-625-0092<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com" target="_blank">eric@sayrelawoffices.com</a><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="background:aqua">Covid-19 Update -
</span></b>All attorneys are working remotely during regular business hours and are available via email and by phone; please call the Seattle office. Videoconferencing also is available. Signing of estate planning documents can be completed and will be handled
on a case-by-case basis; please call the Seattle office.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">MAIL AND DELIVERIES can be received at the Seattle office. For any other needed arrangements, please call the Seattle office.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">
wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a href="mailto:wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbapt-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b><a href="mailto:msafren@jennylinglaw.com" target="_blank">msafren@jennylinglaw.com</a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, October 6, 2020 5:35 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv' <<a href="mailto:wsbapt@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbapt@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [WSBAPT] Questions about a citation hearing to remove naughty Administrator<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hello Learned Listservers,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I have been contacted by a potential client who is seeking to remove an Administrator for misdeeds. Does anyone who has experience with this sort of matter have a few minutes to allow me to check that I’m moving forward correctly on the
procedural front. The Estate is located in King County Washington.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">As I understand it, it requires 20 days notice to the PR for removal and mailing is sufficient form of notice. The notice should include the note, the motion to remove, and a form notice. I’m trying to get a substitute administrator appointed
in place of the Administrator, and I’ll have a oath of administrator signed and ready for the commissioner.
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is there anything else? <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Also I’m trying to decide whether a temporary restraining order is appropriate to restrain the administrator from selling assets of the estate until the citation hearing is complete of if we can temporarily stay the authority of the Administrator
in the same motion for citation. <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I appreciate anyone sharing just a few minutes to speak with me.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks!<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Warmest regards,<br>
<br>
</span><b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:purple">Michael S. Safren, Esq.</span></b>
<b><br>
</b><i>Attorney at Law</i> <br>
<br>
14900 Interurban Ave. S., Ste. 280 | Seattle, WA 98168 <br>
11900 NE 1st St., Bldg. G - Ste. 300 | Bellevue, WA 98005 <br>
P: (206) 859-5098 | E: <a href="mailto:msafren@jennylinglaw.com" target="_blank">
<span style="color:blue">msafren@jennylinglaw.com</span></a> <br>
<u><a href="https://url.emailprotection.link/?bVGMK5zpS0g9LuquogaakRP4xDtjg674qtkoAp0r7gEGws5ca2I3bHe_sOBO7EMyb630vEWoyXO5M0FiIMZbIAw~~" target="_blank"><span style="color:blue">www.jennylinglaw.com</span></a></u> |
<u><a href="https://url.emailprotection.link/?btlGrbuiMcSRUy-9lFiXOliKSsjQ6lNb2wS79Q_BHAdHmPVTYvBwr2En-Ingpp9F4Sq7xdpa4Jyn-CDcIZFfdf9dfwfTMjjOcAvxlrOx_rac2a5WETV-dGZ8kaulXXJhZ" target="_blank"><span style="color:blue">facebook.com/jennylinglaw/</span></a></u>
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<span style="font-size:8pt">This communication, including attachments, may contain information that is confidential and protected by the attorney/client or other privileges. It constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated
recipient(s). If the reader or recipient of this communication is not the intended recipient, an employee or agent of the intended recipient who is responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, or you believe that you have received this communication
in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this e-mail, including attachments without reading or saving them in any manner. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this e-mail, including
attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney/client or other privilege.</span>
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
WSBAPT mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:WSBAPT@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">WSBAPT@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt</a></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><font size="4">*************************************************</font></div>
<div><font size="4">Jayne Marsh Gilbert</font></div>
<div><font size="4">Gilbert and Gilbert Lawyers, PS</font></div>
<div><font size="4">(360) 336-9515</font></div>
<div><font size="4">*************************************************</font></div></div></div></div>