<HTML xmlns:o = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">
<DIV><FONT size=4>I have a old 1967 will, they apparently didn’t do affidavits
of subscribing witness in those days at the same time they did the
will.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>there are two newer codicils, both refer to the original will
by date etc. they both have the affidavits of subscribing witness .
No one in the fam knows the witnesses or what law firm did it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Is there any authority that says “if a codicil refers to a
will, and it has the affidavits of subscribing witness ... that’s good
enough”?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Plan B is a TEDRA agreement which says “we authorize the court
to consider this a valid LW&T” signed by all heirs... CAn anyone share
with me a TEDRA that says that.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Thanks</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Josh</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">
<DIV><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 18pt; COLOR: #004080">Joshua F.
Grant</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="COLOR: #004080"><BR></SPAN><SPAN
style="COLOR: black"><IMG title=advocates
style="BORDER-TOP: 0px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; BACKGROUND-IMAGE: none; BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; DISPLAY: inline; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px"
border=0 alt=advocates src="cid:8FE93A17A8A242DFBAA62A234D6EC594@JoshPC"
width=207 height=43><BR></SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #004080">P.
O. Box 619<BR>Wilbur, WA 99185<BR>509 647 5578</SPAN><SPAN
style="COLOR: black"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>