[WSBAPT] If a public notary prints their name, but does not sign their name, is that notary certification valid?

Fri Jun 19 16:18:12 PDT 2026

Thank you for the update! I’m sure we would all love to hear what you find out if the Department of licensing actually responds to your request!

Best,
Melody

Melody Claire Tucker

Attorney at Law

WSBA #42096

Melody Tucker Law

P.O. Box 2029

Lynnwood, WA 98036

206-228-4980      Fax: 425-743-5921

website:  MelodyTuckerLaw.com

CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication, and the information contained in it, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and immediately destroy all copies of the original message.

On Jun 19, 2026, at 3:30 PM, Andrekita Silva <ak at seattle-silvalaw.com> wrote:

Law Office of F. Andrekita Silva
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

June 19, 2026

Thank you all for your responses.
I believe the statute clearly requires a signature.

As Eric noted, it doesn't matter how or what a person signs, as long as it's that person's "signature."
And as Joshua points out, it must be signed as the signature appears on his application which is on file with the State.

At Melody's suggestion, I looked up this guy up on the State's website. There is no access to his application (I assume this could be secured if necessary for some process.) However, it looks like this guy became a notary for the very first time on March 23 !!  I'm thinking my client may have been this guy's first client and he choked...

I asked my client to go get the revocation certified by someone else.
Totally out of curiousity, I might email to Dept. of Licensing and ask if they'll send me a copy of this guys signature.

Thanks again all!

Andrekita Silva
Law Office of F. Andrekita Silva
1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 940
Seattle, Washington 98101-2509
206-224-8288
ak at seattle-silvalaw.com<mailto:ak at seattle-silvalaw.com>

On 2026/06/19 08:17 AM, Joshua McKarcher wrote:
Erick,

 I agree with you about the common law signature, but I'm fairly
certain if you get into the weeds of the notary public statutes and
regulations and even the forms, it is a requirement (in each of Idaho
and Washington) that a notary use the signature that they provide as
the document or sample on their application.

 For example, my application recites my full legal name as Joshua
David McKarcher for purposes of first identifying me as a human being.

 But then my notary NAME and SIGNATURE is only Joshua McKarcher. I
must order my stamp to read THAT name, and I have to provide an
exemplar of my notary signature in a box.

 It is the case actually that if I suddenly began signing my name,
_Joshua David McKarcher_, those notarial acts would become notorious
(by which I mean naughty even if I'm behaving loosely with the
meanings of words)!!!

 The _Joshua David McKarcher _signatures would be noncompliant under
the rules and regulations because that's not what is on file with the
state or represented on my stamp.

 (Of course the stamp name is irrelevant for signatures that look like
line drawings of a person who can't be bothered. Then only the line
drawing must match the signature on file with the state. )

 There are saving regulations that say things like the instrument is
not automatically invalid (void) only for these technical reasons. But
that does not mean the act is not voidable and that someone could not
challenge the act as invalid because it is noncompliant if they cared
enough to obtain a court order to that effect.

 Please forgive me for this email. Happy Friday! Best, Josh

 Joshua McKarcher

 _Attorney, Owner_
McKarcher Law PLLC
o: (509) 758-3345
josh at mckarcherlaw.com<mailto:josh at mckarcherlaw.com>

-------------------------

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
<wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> on behalf of Eric Nelsen
<eric at sayrelawoffices.com<mailto:eric at sayrelawoffices.com>>
Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2026 09:11:06
To: ak at seattle-silvalaw.com<mailto:ak at seattle-silvalaw.com> <ak at seattle-silvalaw.com<mailto:ak at seattle-silvalaw.com>>; WSBA Probate &
Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] If a public notary prints their name, but does
not sign their name, is that notary certification valid?

Under common law a “signature” can be any kind of mark. It’s
even allowable, for example, to sign “John Smith” as my
idiosyncratic way of signing “Eric Nelsen.” The purpose of a
signature is both instrumental (part of the act of notarizing) and
evidentiary (notary was there and it was truly the notary and not
somebody else). Any mark can meet both purposes.

Marks that don’t bear some relationship to what people would expect
to see as a signature, impairs the evidentiary function. Which is my
longwinded and pompous way of agreeing with Melody—the problem
isn’t that the printed signature is invalid, but that third parties
might be inclined to distrust it.

Sincerely,

Eric

Eric C. Nelsen

Sayre Law Offices, PLLC

1417 31st Ave South

Seattle WA 98144-3909

206-625-0092

eric at sayrelawoffices.com<mailto:eric at sayrelawoffices.com>

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
<wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Andrekita Silva
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2026 12:52 AM
To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBAPT] If a public notary prints their name, but does not
sign their name, is that notary certification valid?

Law Office of F. Andrekita Silva
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

June 18, 2026

Listserve,

If a public notary prints his name, is that notary certification
valid?

RCW 42.45.130 says the certificate must be "signed and dated" in the
same manner as is on file with the state.

A client gave me a revocation to record. But, his name looks 100%
printed. Some people tell me that my signature looks like I've
printed, but it really is my cursive signature. I could not find a
phone number for the notary to ask him if that is his signature or if
he actually only printed his name and forgot to provide his signature.
  I've emailed to my client to ask for this guy's phone number. I'm
going to try to check with this guy to see if that's his signature or
if he printed.

But, what do you all think?  Will this revocation need to be
re-executed?

Andrekita Silva
Law Office of F. Andrekita Silva
1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 940
Seattle, Washington 98101-2509
206-224-8288
ak at seattle-silvalaw.com<mailto:ak at seattle-silvalaw.com>
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20260619/ab49cf74/attachment.html>