[WSBAPT] IRA Beneficiary Issue
John J. Sullivan, Esq.
sullaw at comcast.net
Tue Jun 20 09:37:31 PDT 2023
Tom:
Just one question: Is the beneficiary demanding a cash out, or an in kind distribution of securities? The latter is the only circumstance I can think of where it would be legitimate under the securities regulations for the custodian to require the beneficiary to open an account with the custodian to receive the securities, and that would come with a certain amount of disclosure.
John J. Sullivan
From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Roger Hawkes
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2023 11:07 AM
To: Thomas Fiscus <tjf at thomasjfiscus.net>; WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] IRA Beneficiary Issue
Just say ‘no’.
From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> > On Behalf Of Thomas Fiscus
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2023 10:52 AM
To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBAPT] IRA Beneficiary Issue
Listmates: One of the designated beneficiaries of my deceased client's IRAs is being told by the holder of the IRA (a multistate company with an office in Washington) that she must disclose an extraordinary amount of information about her personal finances in order for the company to set up an account for her into which they can then make IRA distributions to her. I'm aware of the SECURE Act requirements regarding the distribution periods for inherited IRAs, but in this case the beneficiary wants a full distribution (not into an IRA) and understands that she will bear whatever tax consequences there are - so there is no need for her to create an "account" with the holding financial organization. The amount of detail being demanded by the organization is pretty invasive. I have as yet not engaged with the financial institution and am looking for any statutes or IRS regulations that permit (or require) such demands by them. She is a US citizen with a social security number and a bank account in the US into which the funds would be deposited. The demands are such that she is considering disclaiming the gift, rather than have to give all this data to a company to which she does not want a client relationship. Any thoughts about dealing with the financial institution are appreciated.
Thanks
Tom Fiscus
Law Office of Thomas J. Fiscus
Box 1167
Eastsound, WA 98245
Ph 360-298-0534
WSBA # 44741
The contents of this e-mail and its attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s). In addition, this e-mail transmission may be confidential and may be subject to privilege protecting communications between attorneys and clients. If you are not the named addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are directed not to read, disclose, reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this transmission. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege or confidentiality. If you have received this transmission in error, please alert the sender by reply e-mail. Treasury Circular 230 requires that we inform you that any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including attachments, cannot be relied upon for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties, and such statements are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20230620/21fba9d6/attachment.html>
More information about the WSBAPT
mailing list