[WSBAPT] in personum jurisdiction under TEDRA

[Shannon Jones]

Listmates, Is there no authority for in personam jurisdiction under TEDRA of an out-of-state "party" as defined under TEDRA but WA's long arm statute? The asset involved is an investment account. The deceased lived in WA. The asset was claimed by the surviving spouse as part of the mandated family support award with notice to a potential beneficiary who resides outside WA. The asset was unclaimed when the beneficiary was served with the TEDRA petition, it was still in decedent's name. Before the hearing, the beneficiary took control and possession of the asset. The court granted the family support award based on the proceeding being "in rem," and ordered beneficiary to return the asset to the surviving spouse. Beneficiary continues to claim the court had no "in personam" jurisdiction, appealing the court order.

[cid:image001.png at 01D994A2.634B91D0]
Shannon R. Jones | Attorney
Campbell Barnett PLLC
Direct:  253.848.3515
Office: 253.848.3513| Fax: 253.845.4941
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, WA 98371
shannonj at campbellbarnettlaw.com<mailto:shannonj at campbellbarnettlaw.com>
campbellbarnettlaw.com<https://campbellbarnettlaw.com/>

This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s).  If this matter is transmitted to you in error, please delete and notify the sender immediately.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20230601/792bbd57/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5361 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20230601/792bbd57/image001.png>