[WSBAPT] DSHS Creditor's Claim

[Nick Pleasants]

I think this question is mostly irrelevant if there is real property. The automatic lien is going to attach to the real property.
Also, I wrote a discussion about how most state agencies aren't subject to statutes of limitations in response to Jennifer's question back on June 21. I would be somewhat surprised if a court enforced the time limit in Ch. 11.40 RCW against DSHS.
I guess I don't see the point trying to take some technical position against DSHS.

Nicholas Pleasants | Shareholder

[OseranHahnAttyatLaw 8]

11225 SE 6th Street | Suite 100 | Bellevue, WA 98004
Main: (425) 455-3900 | Fax: (425) 455-9201 | E-mail: npleasants at ohswlaw.com<mailto:npleasants at ohswlaw.com>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail message contains information belonging to the law firm of Oseran Hahn, P.S., which may be privileged, confidential and/or protected from disclosure. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you think that you have received this message in error, please e-mail the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited.


From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Roger Hawkes
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 9:50 AM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] DSHS Creditor's Claim

Idk; but the state is not liable for anything it has not agreed to be liable for, like sol violations.  Is there any exception?

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Leighann Hansing
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 3:48 PM
To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBAPT] DSHS Creditor's Claim

Good afternoon,
Hypothetically...
PR sends Notice to DSHS with SSN and Notice to Creditor on 8/15
DSHS send a Creditor's Claim via USPS with a postmark of 9/23
Creditor's Claim is dated 9/14 but the certificate of mailing was notarized 9/15
Creditor's Claim filed 9/26 (not served electronically)

Wouldn't the claim be barred?

Leigh Ann Hansing
Attorney  |  MBA
Mobile: (425) 202-5922
leighann at hansinglegal.com<mailto:leighann at hansinglegal.com>
[cid:image003.png at 01D8D401.ED12D5C0]



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220929/a0dbbf38/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 10176 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220929/a0dbbf38/image002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5175 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220929/a0dbbf38/image003.png>