[WSBAPT] successors under DPOAs

Diane J. Kiepe DJKiepe at depdslaw.com
Sat Jan 15 12:00:58 PST 2022


Sharon 

I think a competent principal to execute a new POA and direct the succor or grant an agent the right to choose successor (although I advise drafting such language with specific parameters).  Amending a POA is not called for in the RCW I don’t believe but revoking prior and executing a new document is proper where the Principal has capacity.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 14, 2022, at 12:49 PM, Joshua McKarcher <josh at mckarcherlaw.com> wrote:
> 
> Absolutely. Or else POAs would be irrevocable upon execution. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Sharon Rutberg
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 12:25 PM
> To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
> Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] successors under DPOAs
> 
> I don't have a good answer for Natalie, but I have a related question about successors under DPOAs. Do you think a still-competent principal could amend an otherwise good DPOA to add a new successor agent, or to give the existing agent the power to appoint a new successor? 
> 
> Sharon C. Rutberg, Attorney at Law
> Salmon Bay Law Group, PLLC
> 1734 NW Market St.
> Seattle, WA 98107
> 206-735-3177, ext. 2
> sharon at salmonbaylaw.com
> Website: www.salmonbaylaw.com
> Washington State Bar #47055
> 
> NOTICES
> The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, and/or other applicable protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message. Thank you for your assistance.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of wsbapt-request at lists.wsbarppt.com
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 12:00 PM
> To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
> Subject: WSBAPT Digest, Vol 88, Issue 16
> 
> Send WSBAPT mailing list submissions to
>    wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    wsbapt-request at lists.wsbarppt.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    wsbapt-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of WSBAPT digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Agent's Power to Appoint Different Successor Agent
>      (Heather de Vrieze)
>   2. Re: First e-will signing - e-presence of 2 witnesses under
>      5.50 (Joshua McKarcher)
>   3. Re: Motion King County Probate Calendar (Dalynne Singleton)
>   4. Re: Protecting the family farm down the generations (Steve King)
>   5. Referrals needed for estate planning lawyers in Sun Valley
>      Idaho (June Campbell)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 20:12:50 +0000
> From: Heather de Vrieze <heatherd at westseattlelaw.com>
> To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Agent's Power to Appoint Different Successor
>    Agent
> Message-ID:
>    <MW3PR22MB2107A38F2735150E2A2268D9A7539 at MW3PR22MB2107.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
>    
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> My understanding on this has been that it must be specifically provided in the document for the agent to be able to delegate, or to be able to identify a successor.
> 
> Heather
> 
> Heather S. de Vrieze
> Attorney-at-Law
> [cid:image001.jpg at 01D80876.E112F9F0]
> 3909 California Avenue SW
> Seattle, WA 98116-3705
> (206)938-5500
> heatherd at westseattlelaw.com<mailto:heatherd at westseattlelaw.com>
> www.westseattlelaw.com<http://www.westseattlelaw.com/>
> Click here to connect with de Vrieze | Carney on Facebook:   [FB Logo] <https://www.facebook.com/DeVriezeCarney>
> 
> CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED. This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this e-mail message and any attachment.
> 
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Natalie Kuehler
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 11:59 AM
> To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: [WSBAPT] Agent's Power to Appoint Different Successor Agent
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Apologies in advance for making the same post on multiple list-serves.
> 
> Can an agent under a 2018 power of attorney who is granted "the power of any absolute owner over the person, assets and liabilities of the Principal" remove an existing successor agent and name a new successor agent, or does that power have to be specifically enumerated under RCW 11.125.110(2)?
> 
> The situation I'm running into is that the principal is no longer competent, and the initial agent is rapidly failing, too, though still competent for the time being. The successor agent who was named by the principal over three years ago has become abusive to the principal. An unrelated person who is trusted by all involved is willing to step in if we can find a way to make it happen. There aren't a lot of assets at risk; this is all about ensuring the continued physical and emotional well-being of the principal.
> 
> Any and all thoughts welcome.
> 
> Thank you!
> Natalie
> 
> 
> 
> Natalie N. Kuehler
> KUEHLER & GRIM PLLC
> PO Box 3059 - 1112 State Route 20
> Winthrop, WA 98862
> o: (509) 996-2832 x1 - c (509) 557-5769
> www.kuehlergrim.com<http://www.kuehlergrim.com>
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This message contains information that may be confidential and protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220113/d160d443/attachment-0001.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.jpg
> Type: image/jpeg
> Size: 17884 bytes
> Desc: image001.jpg
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220113/d160d443/image001-0001.jpg>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image002.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 18009 bytes
> Desc: image002.png
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220113/d160d443/image002-0001.png>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 20:18:51 +0000
> From: Joshua McKarcher <josh at mckarcherlaw.com>
> To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] First e-will signing - e-presence of 2 witnesses
>    under 5.50
> Message-ID:
>    <MW3PR11MB465269008F8CDD19BD991753BB539 at MW3PR11MB4652.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
>    
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> McKarcher Law is custodian under pursuant to 11.12.460(1)(d). This just isn?t as burdensome as keeping a safe full of original paper wills, which I decline to do for all but the nearest-to-death clients with NO family issues.
> 
> I do not read the statute to disallow one qualified custodian to transfer custodianship to another qualified custodian. Specifically, I read .470(1)(b) to permit the ?last in line? qualified custodian to provide the affidavit required; and I expect that, if it was transferred, the affidavit would ADD to the listed requirements, the affiant?s understanding (or even maybe ?proof?) of which qualified custodian(s) held the will previous to the ?last in line? qualified custodian/affiant.
> 
> And, in any event, if the custodians screw up, the will can be proved like a ?lost will? under the revised RCW 11.20.070. And, if there is good evidence that the document has not been modified since signing, admission to probate will be less difficult that admission of a truly lost paper will. I expect these will usually be ?secure PDFs? with a ?modified? file time/date stamp in, say, Windows or Mac ?file explorer? that can easily be rendered on a computer screen; and, indeed, a screenshot of that unmodified date/time stamp for the subject PDF could even easily be added to the custodian?s affidavit. Not so difficult to connect the dots WHEN NEEDED, and it usually won?t be.
> 
> I do think the legislature could do us all a favor and add a sentence to .460 or .470 to expressly state something like ?A qualified custodian may transfer custodianship to another qualified custodian.? If the first is ?still alive? s/he/it could simply provide an affidavit of their own to the successor custodian, which could be an exhibit to the ?last in line? custodian?s post-death affidavit.
> 
> And, in the age of end-to-end encrypted cloud storage and secure links/downloads, this all just doesn?t have to be that difficult and elusive. It can be done smartly and securely and solve a lot of peoples? difficult situations in ways that courts won?t have to rend their garments to adjudicate.
> 
> All the best, Josh
> 
> Joshua D. McKarcher
> McKarcher Law PLLC
> 537 6th Street
> Clarkston, WA 99403
> (509) 758-3345
> (509) 758-3314 (fax)
> josh at mckarcherlaw.com<mailto:josh at mckarcherlaw.com>
> www.mckarcherlaw.com<http://www.mckarcherlaw.com>
> 
> 
> 
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Laura Latta
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 11:49 AM
> To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] First e-will signing - e-presence of 2 witnesses under 5.50
> 
> Joshua,
> Thank you for sharing your practice with us as you blaze this trail. I often joke with my clients that the legal industry is stuck in the 1800s. It's good to see us inching forward. Would you be willing to share how you are handling the qualified custodian requirements? Are you serving as the qualified custodian or is that Simplifile's role?
> 
> Warmly,
> Laura
> 
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:29 AM Joshua McKarcher <josh at mckarcherlaw.com<mailto:josh at mckarcherlaw.com>> wrote:
> Fearless Fellow Estate Planners of Washington:
> 
> Today we will assist a client in signing the first Washington electronic will in our practice. We have found Simplifile?s RON platform as useful as its e-recording platform, and I recommend it if you wish to find a solution for your practice. (They are incredibly open to feedback from the non-real-estate-closing-agent RON users among us.)
> 
> If you wish to play along, we read RCW 11.12.450 (particularly (3)(b) incorporating RCW 5.50) to permit two people on the videoconference with the testator, with no actual remote online notary required (for the will at least), which two people can witness the e-will. If you read it otherwise, I would be grateful for the perspective.
> 
> Indeed, for whatever it?s worth, I share below the asterisks our ?e-will signature block when e-signed under 5.50? (which is nothing spectacular, mostly just a reformatting of the statute sub 3(b), with reader-friendly citations following ?Pursuant to?). We will use Simplifile to e-sign in a videoconference. We intend to have our testator e-initial each page of the will for whatever that is worth to those still reading.
> 
> This has all turned out to be pretty straightforward, especially if you have done a non-will RON session or two first. All my best, Josh
> 
> Joshua D. McKarcher
> McKarcher Law PLLC
> 537 6th Street
> Clarkston, WA 99403
> (509) 758-3345
> (509) 758-3314 (fax)
> josh at mckarcherlaw.com<mailto:josh at mckarcherlaw.com>
> www.mckarcherlaw.com<http://www.mckarcherlaw.com>
> 
> 
> ****************************************
> 
> 
> Pursuant to RCW 11.12.450, I, First M. Last, the Testator, declare under penalty of perjury under the law of Washington that the following is true and correct: That I sign this instrument as my electronic will, I willingly sign it, I execute it as my voluntary act for the purposes expressed in this instrument, and I am 18 years of age or older, of sound mind, and under no constraint or undue influence.
> 
> First M. Last, Testator
> Pursuant to RCW 11.12.450 and chapter 5.50 RCW, we, Kaitlyn M. Landreth and Mary E. Briggs, witnesses, declare under penalty of perjury under the law of Washington that the following is true and correct: That the Testator signed this instrument as the Testator?s electronic will, that the Testator willingly signed it, and that each of us, in the electronic presence of the Testator, signs this instrument as witness to the Testator?s signing, and to the best of our knowledge the Testator is 18 years of age or older, of sound mind, and under no constraint or undue influence.
> 
> 
> 
> Kaitlyn M. Landreth, Witness
> 
> 537 6th Street
> 
> Clarkston, Washington 99403
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mary E. Briggs, Witness
> 
> 537 6th Street
> 
> Clarkston, Washington 99403
> 
> 
> 
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.*** _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
> 
> 
> --
> Laura Latta
> Law Office of Laura Latta PLLC
> she/her
> 
> Phone (206) 841-2344
> www.LauraLatta.com<http://www.LauraLatta.com>
> 
> PO Box 82356
> 
> Kenmore, WA 98028
> 
> NOTICE:  This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by replying to this email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying it or disclosing its contents to others.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220113/1c974f39/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:25:39 +0000
> From: Dalynne Singleton <dalynne at glgmail.com>
> To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Motion King County Probate Calendar
> Message-ID:
>    <BY5PR12MB5542BA4B6739C90EA46FEE10A5539 at BY5PR12MB5542.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
>    
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Get it in as soon as possible but check every day on the court's website before you file as the availability changes daily.
> 
> Dalynne Singleton
> Gourley Law Group
> Snohomish Escrow
> The Exchange Connection
> 1002 10th Street / PO Box 1091
> Snohomish, WA 98291
> 360.568.5065
> 360.568.1717  fax
> dalynne at glgmail.com<mailto:dalynne at glgmail.com>
> Website:  www.glglawgroup.com<http://www.glglawgroup.com/>
> As we face the challenges presented by COVID-19, Attorney/client meetings will be handled by teleconference or virtually whenever possible.  Be assured that we will continue to advise & support our clients throughout this health emergency.  If you would like to set a Zoom or telephone conference with me, please call or email my paralegal theresa at glgmail.com<mailto:theresa at glgmail.com> or dara at glgmail.com<mailto:dara at glgmail.com>.
> LICENSED IN WASHINGTON AND OREGON
> IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail message (and any attachments accompanying it) may contain confidential information, including information protected by attorney-client privilege. The information is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s).  Delivery of this message to anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended to waive any privilege or otherwise detract from the confidentiality of the message.  If you are not the intended recipient, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, do not read, disclose, reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this transmission, rather, please promptly notify the sender by reply e-mail, and then destroy all copies of the message and its attachments, if any.
> [cid:image001.png at 01D80889.6E4B73D0][No alt text provided for this image][cid:image003.gif at 01D80889.6E4B73D0]   [Rated by Super Lawyers] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.superlawyers.com_redir-3Fr-3Dhttp-3A__www.superlawyers.com_washington_lawyer_Gary-2DManca_ca059d21-2D1b6e-2D4fca-2Db396-2D80c253f82402.html-26c-3Demail-5FSmall-5Fbadge-26i-3Dca059d21-2D1b6e-2D4fca-2Db396-2D80c253f82402&d=DwMGaQ&c=4VfW4Y7UDKzr0jHM1Tk29w&r=wJy-5dBh2e8cdp8KTDyWsjq7WPfG_HRNpImWO5yfs2A&m=FCmO2jSMMhwxfYb-8WN5A3L-M6GKeJ_8gc6cS3vECHM&s=z2j9M4GPJAL7pempIOe0TGAPkMWrzXJSlY1lyMRDlRg&e=>
> 
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of michael westseattleattorney.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 11:48 AM
> To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: [WSBAPT] Motion King County Probate Calendar
> 
> Hi, So looks like we now need to note Motion at least 14 days before hearing. Is there any special filing to secure this open spot on calendar? Thanks Mike Atkins
> 
> [cid:image005.png at 01D80889.6E4B73D0]
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220113/39554b9e/attachment-0001.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 5410 bytes
> Desc: image001.png
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220113/39554b9e/image001-0001.png>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image002.jpg
> Type: image/jpeg
> Size: 25680 bytes
> Desc: image002.jpg
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220113/39554b9e/image002-0001.jpg>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image003.gif
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 4747 bytes
> Desc: image003.gif
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220113/39554b9e/image003-0001.gif>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image004.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 1524 bytes
> Desc: image004.png
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220113/39554b9e/image004-0001.png>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image005.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 57245 bytes
> Desc: image005.png
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220113/39554b9e/image005-0001.png>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 16:41:38 +0000
> From: Steve King <steve at talislawfirm.com>
> To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Protecting the family farm down the generations
> Message-ID:
>    <SA1PR17MB5173E5A9BD14CEE39B825466CD549 at SA1PR17MB5173.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
>    
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Hi Ronda,
> 
> I haven't done any work with farms for a while, but I work with Washington taxable estates quite a bit.  I'd be happy to talk about your clients.
> 
> Steve
> 
> Stephen R. King
> steve at talislawfirm.com<mailto:steve at talislawfirm.com>
> 
> Talis Law PLLC
> 915 118 Avenue SE, Suite 360
> Bellevue, WA 98005
> Phone: (425) 943-9968
> Fax: (425) 777-2097
> talislawfirm.com<http://talislawfirm.com/>
> 
> [Facebook]<https://htmlsig.com/t/000001DJJQWC>  [LinkedIn] <https://htmlsig.com/t/000001DJK8H3>   [Maps] <https://htmlsig.com/t/000001DS1V0N>
> 
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Ronda Larson Kramer
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 10:05 PM
> To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
> Subject: [WSBAPT] Protecting the family farm down the generations
> 
> Listmates,
> 
> Would anyone with a lot of experience handling WA state taxable estates and family farmland be able to spare a few minutes on the phone to review my idea for how to help clients with an estate that is not federally taxable but that is over $5 million? There are some complications that I would feel better about if I could run them by someone with more experience than me.
> 
> Ronda Larson Kramer
> J.D., LL.M. Taxation, Owner
> 
> LARSON LAW, PLLC
> Elder Law, Estate Planning
> P.O. Box 7337
> Olympia WA 98507
> Ph: 360-768-0775
> ronda at larsonlawpllc.com<mailto:ronda at larsonlawpllc.com>
> www.larsonlawpllc.com<http://www.larsonlawpllc.com/>
> 
> NOTICES: This message, including attachments, is confidential and may contain information protected by the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message are prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify me immediately. Any tax advice contained in this message is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the internal revenue code or (2) promoting, marketing, or recommending to others any tax-related matter(s) addressed here.
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220114/8c01a71e/attachment-0001.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 2719 bytes
> Desc: image001.png
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220114/8c01a71e/image001-0001.png>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image002.gif
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 1097 bytes
> Desc: image002.gif
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220114/8c01a71e/image002-0001.gif>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image003.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 3129 bytes
> Desc: image003.png
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220114/8c01a71e/image003-0001.png>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image004.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 3463 bytes
> Desc: image004.png
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220114/8c01a71e/image004-0001.png>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:39:38 -0800
> From: June Campbell <campbell.june at gmail.com>
> To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
> Subject: [WSBAPT] Referrals needed for estate planning lawyers in Sun
>    Valley    Idaho
> Message-ID: <D76AD38C-1BFB-47A4-89BB-20C6B2286451 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Anyone have suggestions?  Thanks.
> 
> June Campbell
> Law Office of June K. Campbell
> www.junecampbelllaw.com <http://www.junecampbelllaw.com/>
> 206-227-5016
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This e-mail message is a confidential communication and is protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine and/or any other confidentiality protection. If you are not the designated or authorized recipient, do not read this e-mail message. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, and then delete it. Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20220114/30c8e21a/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.*** _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
> 
> End of WSBAPT Digest, Vol 88, Issue 16
> **************************************
> 
> 
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.*** _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
> 
> 
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt



More information about the WSBAPT mailing list