[WSBAPT] Fwd: Divorce/Enforcement of Property Settlement

Andrekita Silva ak at seattle-silvalaw.com
Mon Jun 28 19:47:44 PDT 2021


  Law Office of
F.ANDREKITA SILVA
____________________________________________  
 
                                                  June  28, 2021
 
Diane,
 
Unless Wife was awarded a judgment which has not yet been paid, she  
may not have a great remedy available.
 
When the court allocates debt, the final decree ordinarily has “hold  
harmless” provisions. If the obligated spouse doesn’t pay a debt, and  
the creditor goes after non-obligated spouse, if non-obligated spouse  
pays the creditor’s demand, or  is sued and garnished, etc. then the  
non-obligated spouse can go back to court in the dissolution case and  
ask for a judgment against the obligated spouse.
 
Unless this is a small credit card debt, this can be a useless  
remedy.  If the obligated spouse had the means to pay the mortgage,  
they probably wouldn’t have let a house go into foreclosure, etc.
 
Presumably, husband was awarded the home because he appeared to have  
the financial strength at the time of the order to make the payments.   
In a divorce, if neither party looks like they can buy out the other  
or make the payments, the court will order the home to be sold and the  
equity divided.  
 
When a home IS awarded to one or the other, once title vests in the  
spouse to receive the real property, the court loses it's authority to  
order a sale. 
Unless the failure to pay money is related to support, then contempt  
isn't an option. 

To avoid harm to the spouse that didn't receive the home for debt non  
payment, there should be a provision requiring the party who was  
awarded the home to refinance within a certain amount of time. It  
looks like this decree didn’t have such a provision?
 
Basically, the non obligated spouse has limited options.  They can  
negotiate a resolution with the obligated spouse to lend money in  
exchange for a lien on the home and contract and/ or modification of  
the decree to include provisions that SHOULD have been included in the  
original decree.
 
If the obligated spouse plans on letting the home foreclose, if the  
non obligated spouse has the financial ability, they can enter into an  
agreement/ contract to take over payments and sell the home to avoid  
bad credit (worse credit).
 
If the non obligated spouse can’t afford to bail out the other, and if  
the home forecloses, then they live with bad credit.  Although, they  
can explain on credit report that other side was ordered to pay, etc.   
That may or may not help them.  
 
If when you say the obligated spouse “defaulted”, you just meant they  
made some late payments, then non- obligated spouse should see this as  
an opportunity to take proactive steps to avoid a more dire situation.  
They can try to secure a voluntary contract from obligated spouse that  
lays out what happens in the event of late payments, etc. 

It seems like I once read a case where a non obligated spouse made  
mortgage payments before a demand was ever made by the creditor.   
Since the decree didn’t say payments couldn’t be late and/ or that  
non-obligated could pay before a creditor demand was made, the court  
said “that was a gift.” 
 
A court can't read provisions into a decree that aren't there.  Since  
a default can be envisioned, it wouldn't be a change in circumstances  
to support modification of the decree.  So, I’m not aware that the  
court has the authority to order a modification or a remedy other than  
indemnification.
 
andrekita
Law Office of F. Andrekita Silva
1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2000
Seattle, Washington 98101
206-224-8288
www.seattle-silvalaw.com

----- Forwarded message from Candace Wilkerson  
<cwilkerson at wongfleming.com> -----
    Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 20:47:15 +0000
    From: Candace Wilkerson <cwilkerson at wongfleming.com>
Reply-To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Divorce/Enforcement of Property Settlement
      To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
 

   Hi Diane,

    

    

    

    

   Our firm has several attorneys who might be able to help.  The PC  
can call our office and ask for a free initial consult (425-869-4040).

    

    

    

    

   Best,

    

   Candace

    

    

    

    

    /*Candace is available to respond to emails and phone calls  
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.  If you have an urgent  
matter outside that time period, please call our office at the number  
below./

     

     

     

     

     

    Top Ranked Law Firm for 2015 by Fortune Magazine and American Lawyer Media

     

    Candace Wilkerson  | Senior Associate  |  Wong Fleming 

     

     

    10675 Willows Road NE, Suite 250  |  Redmond, WA 98052
Phone: 425.869.4040  |  Fax: 425.869.4050
cwilkerson at wongfleming.com

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of  
Wong Fleming, please do not include any information in this e-mail  
that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret  
nature. Wong Fleming has no duty to keep confidential any of the  
information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your  
information is considered a request for legal advice, securing legal  
services or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with  
Wong Fleming or any lawyer at Wong Fleming is not established until  
and unless Wong Fleming agrees to such a relationship as reflected in  
a separate writing.

IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements  
imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice  
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not  
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of  
(a) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (b)  
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction  
or matter addressed herein.

     

    THIS ELECTRONIC MAIL TRANSMISSION AND ANY ATTACHMENTS MAY CONTAIN  
PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR  
THE PERSON(S) NAMED. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED  
RECIPIENT OR THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,  
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISTRIBUTION, COPYING, OR DISCLOSURE  
OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED

     

    

    

    

     FROM: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com  
<wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> ON BEHALF OF Diane J. Kiepe
SENT: Monday, June 28, 2021 4:14 PM
TO: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
SUBJECT: [WSBAPT] Divorce/Enforcement of Property Settlement

      

    

    

    

   Any names that you can share in the area of Divorce/property  
settlement issues would be greatly appreciated.  Divorce decree  
provided for husband to reside in primary residence and pay mortgage.   
He is in default and ex-spouse still has name on loan so  
understandably concerned.  I’d be worthless for her so I’m hoping you  
all can share an east siders name.

    

    

    

    

   /Diane J. Kiepe/

    

    

   / /

    

   Diane J. Kiepe

    

   Douglas Eden

    

   717 W. Sprague Ave.

    

   Suite 1500

    

   Spokane, WA  99201

    

   djkiepe at depdslaw.com

    

   509-455-5300

    

    

    

    



----- End forwarded message -----

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20210628/35e5dac7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 18978 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20210628/35e5dac7/image001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 151 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20210628/35e5dac7/image002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 151 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20210628/35e5dac7/image002-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5985 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20210628/35e5dac7/image003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5042 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20210628/35e5dac7/image004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Candace Wilkerson <cwilkerson at wongfleming.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Divorce/Enforcement of Property Settlement
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 20:47:15 +0000
Size: 52642
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20210628/35e5dac7/ForwardedMessage.mht>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list