[WSBAPT] Declaration of Erik and Scott

[G M]

Michael and Christi,


And can you explain the check titled “surfboard” as this does relate to the
estate, which you oversee. It has nothing to do with someone named “Hunter.”

Are you trying to pay me for a surfboard, if so, what is the dollar amount
from the check that totals a surfboard.

Should I send Christi a small claims notice instead of you for the
surfboard?

Gale

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:35 PM G M <galemcarthur at gmail.com> wrote:

> Michael Smith,
>
> You are now aware of small claims court.
>
> Can you tell me if you are taking personally ownership of contempt? Or is
> the Christi Goeller?
>
> I am still unclear who is the attorney of record. Can you please send me a
> copy of your notice of appearance?
>
> Gale
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:32 PM G M <galemcarthur at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Michael,
>>
>> My stance is and always has been requesting an 1. update of my probate,2.
>> mediation, 3. reunification- that’s only  “adversial” because you have been
>> litigious and aren’t acting  as a neutral representative.
>>
>>  I don’t see how reunification is adversial or taking any side.
>>
>> I will let the courts know that you have refused to keep me looped as an
>> heir, unless you’d like to change your stance.
>>
>> I think we need court intervention at this point.
>>
>> You are wasting the estate’s money by not doing your  job.
>>
>> Don’t you agree?
>>
>> Gale
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:02 PM Michael Smith <
>> Michael.Smith at lucelawfirm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ms. McArthur,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Your brothers have been kept informed of probate proceedings.  They are
>>> not being represented by our office in this matter.  When someone has
>>> attended a telephonic court hearing at our office, it was at your father’s
>>> request to accompany him.  This is the same as if they attended a court
>>> hearing at the courthouse and sat in the gallery to listen prior to Covid
>>> limitations.  No special treatment has been provided.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The Declarations you attached to your earlier email are from a different
>>> court matter.  In addition, the declarations do not indicate
>>> representation.  A declaration is a factual assertion made by an individual
>>> about information that may be helpful for the court’s consideration of an
>>> issue.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In addition, you have taken adversarial positions towards the estate and
>>> against me individually.  Therefore, no, I cannot provide you with any
>>> assistance on your motions, or provide you with any representation.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* G M <galemcarthur at gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Monday, November 16, 2020 11:24 AM
>>> *To:* Heather Benedict <hjelbenedict at gmail.com>; Michael Smith <
>>> Michael.Smith at lucelawfirm.com>
>>> *Subject:* Re: Declaration of Erik and Scott
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *[EXTERNAL MAIL]* DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you
>>> recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you please respond to me by EOD today?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I will be compelled to record your non-responsive into a motion
>>> requesting to remove you as the PR, and a complaint with the bar.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Will you include me in the same capacity you are including Erik and
>>> Scott on my mother’s probate?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes or no.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Answer by EOD.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Gale
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 5:42 PM G M <galemcarthur at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Attached are declarations of Erik and Scott, from Pierce County case, on
>>> Luce & Associates letterhead and filed by Luce.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can your firm represent me in this same capacity? Help me with motions?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Or are you only representing Erik, Scott and Jim?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please advise.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Gale
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20201116/6024db23/attachment.html>