[WSBAPT] adverse possession tacking

Rob Wilson-Hoss rob at hctc.com
Mon Nov 12 14:02:34 PST 2018


Assume the ten years ran before common ownership, so title to the
encroached-upon area has passed by operation of law. When the same person
took title to the second parcel, did she or he do so with the result that
they were still two separate parcels? If so, title already passed to the
encroached area, and nothing changed that. But if it was in some way that
resulted in one common ownership of one parcel that was made up of the two
former parcels (BLA?), then I would want to work through merger doctrines to
make sure there was no merger of title that might make a difference.

 

Rob

 

Robert D. Wilson-Hoss 
Hoss & Wilson-Hoss, LLP 
236 West Birch Street 
Shelton, WA 98584 
360 426-2999

www.hossandwilsonhoss.com
 <mailto:rob at hctc.com> rob at hctc.com

 

This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law.  If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified
that any use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify us by
reply e-mail or by telephone (call us collect at the number listed above)
and immediately delete this message and any and all of its attachments.
Thank you.

 

This office does debt collection and this e-mail may be an attempt to
collect a debt, Any information obtained will be used for that purpose.  To
the extent the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 1692)
applies this firm is acting as a debt collector for the
condominium/homeowners' association named above to collect a debt owed to
it. Any information obtained will be used for collection purposes. You have
the right to seek advice of legal counsel.

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of
ofcounsl1 at mindspring.com
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 1:44 PM
To: 'WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv'
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] adverse possession tacking

 

If the adverse use fully matured before the parcels were in common
ownership, then the common ownership could do nothing to affect the adverse
use. Conversely, if the adverse use was not fully mature when the parcels
went into common ownership, the common owner could not adversely possess
against himself, so no adverse possession occurred during common ownership.

Chris Constantine

Of Counsel Inc., P.S.

P. O. Box 7125

Tacoma, WA 98417-0125

(253) 752-7850

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
On Behalf Of joyce at schwensenlaw.com
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 12:54 PM
To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBAPT] adverse possession tacking

 

I think the answer to this is pretty obvious but I want to check my gut. 

 

There is an adverse encroachment of improvements from one parcel onto the
neighboring parcel. Both parcels eventually come into common ownership.
Later common owner sells the two parcels separately. New owners with adverse
possession claim have not yet owned their property for 10 years. Did the
common ownership end the adverse possession so that the new owners cannot
tack the time of their adverse possession to any time prior to their
ownership?

 

Thank you very much.

 

Joyce Schwensen

 

Law Office of Joyce S. Schwensen

Joyce S. Schwensen, PS

12055 15th Ave NE
Seattle, WA  98125 
Tel: (206) 367-1065

Fax: (425) 324-3335 
 <mailto:Joyce at SchwensenLaw.com> Joyce at SchwensenLaw.com

 <http://www.schwensenlaw.com/> www.SchwensenLaw.com

 

PLEASE NOTE NEW ADDRESS: 12055 15TH AVE. NE, SEATTLE, WA 98125.

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This communication (including any attachments) is confidential and may
contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient or believe that you may have received this communication in error,
please delete this communication from your computer and do not retransmit,
copy, print or otherwise disseminate this communication.

ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP:
This e-mail does not in any way intend to provide legal advice to be relied
upon by any recipient and does not create any duty or obligation for legal
representation on behalf of the sender Joyce S. Schwensen, PS on behalf of
the recipient of this e-mail without a written engagement agreement.

REFERRALS:

Please note that no referral by this law firm to other legal professionals
is intended as a guaranty or assurance as to the experience, ability,
professionalism or other characteristics of such legal professionals.

 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20181112/c540ad5c/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list