[WSBAPT] Power of Attorney/Revocable Trust

Thu Nov 1 10:06:52 PDT 2018

Hi Steven,

This exact situation is a big reasoning for WA new POA law.  Financial institutions can be very difficult to work with.  I had one turn down a POA that I did because their institution was not specifically made, an other one turn us down because it wasn't on their form.  In the later case a phone call, with the suggestion that getting a court order and a news story on air shouldn't be necessary.

If the POA is a springing form, and your client did not provide a letter that "triggered" her authority that could be creating problems.  That shouldn't be difficult to get under the circumstances.  Also, make sure your client doesn't speak to someone at the first level, insist on management and if management doesn't help, ask for their legal counsel's number.

Last resort may be a TEDRA action against the institution, who may not appear, getting court order that the POA, if properly effective, be honored.

It is definitely an issue that hopefully  the new state provides answers to in the form of the Agents Affidavit.

Best,

Diane J. Kiepe

Diane J. Kiepe, Attorney at Law
Douglas * Eden
717 W. Sprague Ave., Suite 1500
Spokane, WA  99201
Phone:  (509) 455-5300
Fax:        (509) 455-5348
djkiepe at depdslaw.com

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of steve mcconnell
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:25 PM
To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBAPT] Power of Attorney/Revocable Trust

Attorney in fact pursuant to a POA prepared in 2013 pursuant to RCW 11.94 advises that several banking institutions holding accounts in the name of 101 year old principal's revocable living trust will not allow AIF to access those funds to allow her to pay principal's nursing home fees. I do not yet have the banks reasoning (according to client/AIF it is because AIF's name isn't on the account) but will likely speak with them tomorrow. The POA grants AIF broadest powers, including "all powers as an  absolute owner" and the power to "exercise the principal's right to distribute property in trust or cause a trustee to distribute property in trust to the extent consistent with the terms of the trust agreement". Revocable trust was created by principal for principal's benefit while living, including the right to the distribution of all principal and income. Any thoughts as to what the bank's arguments might be? This seems fairly straightforward to me so I'm having trouble understanding how multiple banks could be taking this position.

Thanks in advance.

Steven M. McConnell
Attorney at Law
144 Railroad Ave., Suite 308
Edmonds, WA  98020-4100
Tel:  (206) 783-0201
Fax: (206) 789-5199
Email:  smcconnelllaw at hotmail.com<mailto:smcconnelllaw at hotmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20181101/fe14a62c/attachment.html>