[WSBAPT] cr 2a enforcement

[Rob Wilson-Hoss]

How's this?

 

Settlement agreement signed by parties following mediation in quiet title and partition action was not required to be signed by their attorneys to be binding under rule precluding enforcement of unrecorded settlement agreements if purport of agreement is disputed.   <https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=Y&serNum=1999033718&pubNum=0000661&originatingDoc=N7DCF3EF0E51C11DABEF2AC134BDD1C03&refType=RP&originationContext=notesOfDecisions&contextData=%28sc.Category%29&transitionType=NotesOfDecisionItem> In re Patterson (1999) 93 Wash.App. 579, 969 P.2d 1106.

 

Happy holidays.

 

Rob

 

Robert D. Wilson-Hoss 
Hoss & Wilson-Hoss, LLP 
236 West Birch Street 
Shelton, WA 98584 
360 426-2999

www.hossandwilson-hoss.com
rob at hctc.com

 

This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or by telephone (call us collect at the number listed above) and immediately delete this message and any and all of its attachments.  Thank you.

 

This office does debt collection and this e-mail may be an attempt to collect a debt, Any information obtained will be used for that purpose.  To the extent the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 1692) applies this firm is acting as a debt collector for the condominium/homeowners' association named above to collect a debt owed to it. Any information obtained will be used for collection purposes. You have the right to seek advice of legal counsel.

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Roger Hawkes
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 3:45 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Subject: [WSBAPT] cr 2a enforcement

 

Rule cr 2 a says parties or attorneys can entire into written stipulations; but the last sentence of that rule says that such stipulation can be enforced against “attorneys” who signed it.  nothing about parties in that last sentence.  Is there an appellate decision stating that parties without attorneys can be held to their cr  2a



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20181217/4ea5d545/attachment.html>