[WSBAPT] Trespass - No Contact Order - Evicted mobile home tenant moves in with another tenant

[Scott Hildebrand]

Nice practice tip, especially in those cases where the tenant has been a bad actor!

 

Best,

Scott Hildebrand

Attorney at Law

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Craig Gourley
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 9:08 AM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Trespass - No Contact Order - Evicted mobile home tenant moves in with another tenant

 

When I do an eviction I include a “forever barred from the property” section in my judgment.   I have not received any pushback from the judges and we then have a court order that the police will usually enforce. 

 

Gourley Law Group

Snohomish Escrow

The Exchange Connection

 

1002 10th Street / PO Box 1091

Snohomish, WA 98291

 

360.568.5065

360.568.8092  fax

Craig at glgmail.com <mailto:Craig at glgmail.com> 

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>  [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Neli Espe, J.D. - Olympic Legal
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 7:52 AM
To: Solo and Small Practice Section <solo-and-small-practice-section at list.wsba.org <mailto:solo-and-small-practice-section at list.wsba.org> >; WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: [WSBAPT] Trespass - No Contact Order - Evicted mobile home tenant moves in with another tenant

 

Dear colleagues, 

 

Forgive the second posting of this request, the first one appears to be caught in a junk mail folder . . .

 

A person just evicted from a mobile home park moves right back in with another tenant and places his junk vehicles on the 'new' lot. When police is told by landlord that "he is trespassing,” police tells landlord that he has to get a "no contact order.” 

 

A lot has been spent on the eviction already with no possibility of recovering the judgment amount.

 

What might be a common sense approach to the situation? Any pointers?

 

Thanks,

 

Neli T. Espe

__________________

Olympic Legal

360.630.3635

2114 Commercial Ave.

Anacortes, WA

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20171024/bfab9c86/attachment.html>