[WSBAPT] New Power of Attorney Act Questions

Wed Mar 22 11:28:01 PDT 2017

All –

I’d be interested to hear a bit of your respective reasoning behind separate docs…..  I more often am finding combined to be appropriate…

Marilyn J. Kliman, Attorney at Law

Marilyn J. Kliman Law, PLLC

510 Bell Street

Edmonds, WA 98020

206.499.0993

Marilyn at MarilynJKlimanLaw.com

www.MarilynJKlimanLaw.com <http://www.marilynjklimanlaw.com/> 

NOTICE: Information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally protected from disclosure. Our understanding is that intended recipients consent to use of e-mail unless we are notified otherwise in writing. If you are not the intended recipient, nor an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Douglas Bratt
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:15 AM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] New Power of Attorney Act Questions

I am thinking that I fully agree that the reasons that encouraged many of us to do separate DPA’s before are still part of the picture and that separate docs continue to make the most sense.

Thanks so much to all who commented on this issue.

Best Regards,

Doug Bratt

Douglas J. Bratt

Lawyer

Envelope scaled Terry

Office: (360) 213-2040 

 Fax: (360) 213-2030

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email message may contain confidential or privileged information.  If you have received this message by mistake, please do not review, disclose, copy, or distribute the email. Instead, please notify us immediately by replying to this message or telephoning us.  Thank you.

NOTE:  I do not use encrypted email.  Messages sent to or from my office via email are not secure and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege.  This email address is not monitored at all times.  If your matter is urgent, please phone my office during regular business hours.

TAX ADVICE NOTICE: IRS Circular 230 requires us to advise you that, if this communication or any attachment contains any tax advice, the advice is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Josh Grant
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:35 AM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] New Power of Attorney Act Questions

One thought :  It may be better to have separate documents to make it easier for the client to make a change in one without effecting the other “power”.

From: Setareh Mahmoodi <mailto:mahmoodi.setareh at gmail.com>  

Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 9:01 PM

To: WSBA Probate  <mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com> & Trust Listserv 

Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] New Power of Attorney Act Questions

I always do separate HC POA and Financial DPOA as well. I don't see anything in the statute prohibiting that as well. 

Setareh 

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Douglas Bratt <djbratt at mbavancouverlaw.com> wrote:

Listmates:

Re-opening a dialogue of about six weeks ago, I have a question about the new Power of Attorney Act when applied to the development of Durable POA’s for Clients to sign.

Very often, I have clients who prefer to have different persons making financial decisions as opposed to health care decisions.  For that reason, I have, over the past number of years, had clients sign a separate Health Care DPA and a separate DPA for Financial Affairs.  The Health Care providers seemed to prefer that approach, and with all of the HIPPA stuff we were dealing with over the past number of years, there was enough stuff to put into a Health Care DPA.

In studying the new Act related to my development of  new DPA forms, I saw nothing in the statute that would make me think that I need to have two different such documents anymore.  However, I also saw nothing in the new Act that would prevent the appointment of an “Agent” solely for Health Care decisions, and an “Agent” solely for non-health care decisions in the same new DPA document.

Has anyone noted anything in the statute that would prevent such an approach, and does anyone see any pitfalls of doing so in an appropriate circumstance?  

Yes, I know that is a compound question, but please be patient with an older fellow.

Thanks for any of your insights.

Doug Bratt  

Douglas J. Bratt

Lawyer

Envelope scaled Terry

Office: (360) 213-2040 <tel:(360)%20213-2040>  

Fax: (360) 213-2030 <tel:(360)%20213-2030> 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email message may contain confidential or privileged information.  If you have received this message by mistake, please do not review, disclose, copy, or distribute the email. Instead, please notify us immediately by replying to this message or telephoning us.  Thank you.

NOTE:  I do not use encrypted email.  Messages sent to or from my office via email are not secure and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege.  This email address is not monitored at all times.  If your matter is urgent, please phone my office during regular business hours.

TAX ADVICE NOTICE: IRS Circular 230 requires us to advise you that, if this communication or any attachment contains any tax advice, the advice is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. 

_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt

-- 

Please always call 206-683-1006 or email before dropping by the office as I could be in court or meetings. Thanks! 

Best regards, 

Setareh Mahmoodi 

Attorney at Law 

18222 104th Ave NE, Suite 103

Bothell, WA 98011

Phone: 425-806-1500

Cell: 206-683-1006

Fax: 425-489-4142 (Please email documents if at all possible) 

Website: http://www.lawofficesofsm.com/

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments is a transmission from the law firm and is intended for the recipient only.  It may contain information that is confidential and legally protected by the attorney-client, work product and/or other privileges.  If you are not the designated or intended recipient, please destroy the message without disclosing any of its contents and notify us immediately by reply email or by calling (425) 806-1500.

Pursuant to U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

  _____  

_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20170322/40a96fc8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6775 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20170322/40a96fc8/image001.jpg>