[WSBAPT] (no subject)

Tue Jun 27 11:01:52 PDT 2017

Yes, a recent case has liberalized the rule with some caveats post 2013.  See GR 14.1

G. Geoffrey Gibbs | Anderson Hunter Law Firm
2707 Colby Avenue | Everett, WA  98201
Phone: (425) 252-5161 | Fax: (425) 258-3345
ggibbs at andersonhunterlaw.com<mailto:ggibbs at andersonhunterlaw.com> / www.andersonhunterlaw.com<http://www.andersonhunterlaw.com/>
[Description: Description: AH Color Large-no-tag]
This email message may contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized use is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Paul Neumiller
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 10:55 AM
To: 'WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv' <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] (no subject)

Off topic but, did I miss a case or something?  I thought we weren't supposed to cite unpublished cases.

[cid:image003.jpg at 01D2EF34.C7515620]

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Rob Wilson-Hoss
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 10:06 AM
To: 'WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv' <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
Subject: [WSBAPT] (no subject)

A month or so I posted a question about taking costs and fees to deal with a problem (intransigent)  heir out of his share of the Estate distributions. There seemed to be no cases, just the obvious TEDRA language about awarding fees equitably.

See today's Div III unpublished (but citable now) In re Estate of Miller, which says,

Bill argues that the trial court erred in assessing the costs incurred by the estate against his share of the inheritance. That was a common, and totally appropriate, action for the judge to make. There was no abuse of the trial court's discretion. By statute, the judge is authorized to assign costs of estate administration, including litigation expenses. RCW 11.96A.150(l)(c) provides in part that the court may order the costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, to be paid in such amount and in such manner as the court determines to be equitable. In exercising its discretion under this section, the court may consider any and all factors that it deems to be relevant and appropriate, which factors may but need not include whether the litigation benefits the estate or trust involved. The statute squarely recognizes that trial judges have discretion in their authority to act equitably. Accordingly, the appellate courts consistently have reviewed attorney fee awards under the Trust and Estate Dispute Resolution Act (TEDRA), chapter 11.96A 3 No. 34226-3-III In re Estate of Miller RCW, for abuse of discretion. See, e.g., In re Guardianship of Lamb, 173 Wn.2d 173, 198,265 P.3d 876 (2011) ("The express language ofRCW 11.96A.150 leaves attorney fee awards in cases resolving guardianship disputes to the court's discretion. The statute allows a court considering a fee award to consider any relevant factor."); In re Estate of Black, 153 Wn.2d 152, 173, 102 P.3d 796 (2004). Discretion is abused when it is exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons. State ex rel. Carroll v. Junker, 79 Wn.2d 12, 26, 482 P.2d 775 (1971).

Well, now. That works for me. Bill also got dinged for attorney fees on appeal.

Rob

Robert D. Wilson-Hoss
Hoss & Wilson-Hoss, LLP
236 West Birch Street
Shelton, WA 98584
360 426-2999
www.hossandwilson-hoss.com<www.hossandwilsonhoss.com>
rob at hctc.com<mailto:rob at hctc.com>

This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or by telephone (call us collect at the number listed above) and immediately delete this message and any and all of its attachments.  Thank you.

This office does debt collection and this e-mail may be an attempt to collect a debt, Any information obtained will be used for that purpose.  To the extent the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 1692) applies this firm is acting as a debt collector for the condominium/homeowners' association named above to collect a debt owed to it. Any information obtained will be used for collection purposes. You have the right to seek advice of legal counsel.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20170627/1da25414/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1721 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20170627/1da25414/image002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 7433 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20170627/1da25414/image003.jpg>