[WSBAPT] Expansion of LLLT Program into Elder Law

[Carl L. Gay]

I suppose if I were still in law school (and I know that thought will
inadvertently inspire some horrifying nightmare later this evening
notwithstanding the passage of four decades), I wonder if I would expect the
professor to pose a Socratic query asking me to distinguish why, if a
non-lawyer layperson could be a client advocate in probate court, would it
not be equally fair to permit a silver-tongued non-lawyer layperson to
prosecute and present to a jury a personal injury lawsuit? Arguably, an
intersection collision is a less complicated legal matter than the issues
posed by Mr. Weddle.

 

Best regards,

Carl Gay

Port Angeles

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Dewey Weddle
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:52 AM
To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBAPT] Expansion of LLLT Program into Elder Law

 

Dear Mr. Kirkevold:

 

I have attached a letter expressing my concerns about the proposal to expand
the LLLT Program into the area of Elder Law.  I hope other attorneys who
practice Elder Law will also voice their opinions, whether they support or
oppose the proposal.  A change of this magnitude should not be made without
a thorough discussion of the consequences.   

 

Best regards,

 

Dewey

 

Law Office of Dewey W. Weddle, PLLC
909 Seventh Street
Anacortes, WA 98221

 

Phone:  360-293-3600
Fax:    360-293-3700

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20170213/d25c8697/attachment.html>