[WSBAPT] Notice to Creditors

[Krista MacLaren]

Thanks, Randy.  This makes sense.  I appreciate you taking the time to answer!

Krista

> On Sep 20, 2016, at 3:56 AM, Randolph Petgrave <RandGrave at msn.com> wrote:
> 
> Krista,
>  
> I've always sent my notice to: Department of Revenue 1025 Union Ave SE, Suite 300, Olympia, WA 98501.
>  
> As for your second question, I would sent the notice anyway, there's no reason not to.  If for some reason the account has not been paid, or there is a problem, you have started the necessary time clocks to limit the time for a claim to be filed.
>  
> Hopefully this was helpful.
>  
> Randy
> 
> 
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> on behalf of Krista MacLaren <kjm.inc at mac.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 9:08 AM
> To: wsba probate & trust
> Subject: [WSBAPT] Notice to Creditors
>  
> Hi Folks,
> 
> I am looking for two things:
> 
> 1)  The proper address to mail the notice to creditors to WA DOR in the case decedent ran his own business.  The DOR has a list of multiple addresses and their purpose, but the only one relating to estates specifically is Estate Tax section.  I am thinking I am sending notice not because I expect him to owe estate taxes, but in case he owes back business taxes of any kind. Is that the purpose of the notice to DOR?  The statute, RCW 82.32.240, makes me think maybe I should notify DOR in every estate, not just where decedent ran his/her own business.
> 
> My other question is: In order to bar creditors after 4 months, I always publish notice and send it to all “reasonably ascertainable” creditors, but I get hung up on whether if, say decedent had a phone line, and heirs contact the phone company and they pay the “final” bill, then would the phone company still be a reasonably ascertainable creditor?  I have always treated it as such, providing actual notice even though the heir was told the account was paid, in case of a record keeping error or whatever, I figured if decedent had an account with the company, they are a potential creditor.  Is this overkill?  My clients often find this non-sensical.  I always feel that if we are going to go to the trouble and expense of publishing and providing actual notice to certain creditors, we should send it to every conceivable creditor.
> 
> Thank you for any thoughts.
> 
> Krista
> 
> Krista J. MacLaren
> Attorney at Law
> Northgate Executive Center II
> 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 600
> Seattle, WA 98115
> (206)523-6116
> kjm.inc at mac.com <mailto:kjm.inc at mac.com>
> 
> Please note, as with most email providers, Mac does not encrypt email messages.  Accordingly, the confidentiality of messages sent to this address cannot be assured.  This e-mail is intended for viewing only by the individual or entity to whom its content is addressed, and it may contain confidential or privileged information.  If you received this email in error, please honor the privacy of the intended recipient: reply to the sender regarding the error and delete the message. 
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt <http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160920/a4ab55be/attachment.html>