[WSBAPT] creditor claim

[Teresa Byers]

Krista,

Were either you or the personal representative served with the claim? It's not enough to file with the court, see RCW 11.40.070:

a) Serving on or mailing to, by regular first-class mail, the personal representative or the personal representative's attorney a copy of the signed claim; and (b) filing the original of the signed claim with the court in which probate proceedings were commenced. A claim is deemed presented upon the later of the date of postmark or service on the personal representative, or the personal representative's attorney, and filing with the court.


-----Original Message-----
From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Josh Grant
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 2:15 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] creditor claim

I don't see any good argument that a creditor who timely  files a creditor's claim in an estate which was properly  opened, is somehow barred from collecting the full amount of his claim simply because the PR elected to open a second estate file.

-----Original Message-----
From: Krista MacLaren
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 2:55 PM
To: wsba probate & trust
Subject: [WSBAPT] creditor claim

Hi Folks,

I have a creditor claim scenario I have never contemplated before.  When decedent died, her best friend attempted to handle many of the immediate issues that needed attention before obtaining legal advice.  As part of that, she got an order from the King County Superior Court in Kent to have a safe deposit box opened to check for a will.  No will was found.  Later, she and the family contacted me to assist them in opening a probate, with no mention made of the Kent court action.

I opened probate in the Seattle KCSC and issued notices to creditors, including a credit union with whom the decedent had a credit card.  Credit Union did not file a claim under the Seattle cause number, but they had already filed a claim under the Kent cause number (before I had sent the Notice to Creditors).  I don’t know how they even knew about the Kent cause number.  I only learned of it because I was out of the office and wanted to check the court file, but didn’t have the cause number, so I did a case search online and found two separate cause numbers.  When they received the Notice to Creditors that I sent, they did not file their claim under the Seattle cause number.  They may not have noticed the cause numbers were different and just figured they had already filed their claim.

Now the creditor claim period has passed, and I am wondering whether we must pay them, whether we should not pay them, whether this is a defect that the PR may waive - ?  The estate is quite small and the claim is around $7,000. 
The PR just wants to do what is appropriate, and has no special interest in avoiding payment, but does want to protect himself from accusations of wrongdoing.

Thank you for any suggestions!

Krista J. MacLaren
Attorney at Law
Northgate Executive Center II
9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 600
Seattle, WA 98115
(206) 523-6116
kjm.inc at me.com





_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.fsr.com_mailman_listinfo_wsbapt&d=CwIGaQ&c=6idGanR0FVrJazfUTK6n_mJ1j9ArrOFLiF5y-BMxq2I&r=aOXR7BqVOUbhgVZiJLV_hbDMUwsGvuNSgE2UIpjShi0&m=MbBwgc3M00pXw4AgJgn9sjhpUA24nY9QDuCvmp1DPfM&s=hCLCVDkoIt_8KqbGCG2ps1ZU7zJ0V-NwsY1ksSU7Ek4&e=  


_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.fsr.com_mailman_listinfo_wsbapt&d=CwIGaQ&c=6idGanR0FVrJazfUTK6n_mJ1j9ArrOFLiF5y-BMxq2I&r=aOXR7BqVOUbhgVZiJLV_hbDMUwsGvuNSgE2UIpjShi0&m=MbBwgc3M00pXw4AgJgn9sjhpUA24nY9QDuCvmp1DPfM&s=hCLCVDkoIt_8KqbGCG2ps1ZU7zJ0V-NwsY1ksSU7Ek4&e=