[WSBAPT] Re-post: Question RE: Request for Special Notice

Fri May 1 11:44:34 PDT 2015

Jared, I have not experienced this, but certainly tit seems that the hearing steps at the point of the Decl of Completion will be more fruitful because all the fees will be known at the time—but I don’t see why, if there is an issue with the hourly rates, this could not be resolved before—but understanding the issues of the objecting party would potentially shed light on whether this should be resolved now rather than later at conclusion. Although, if you cannot informally resolve the issue with the objecting party, you still have to undertake the response and hearing steps (something that the objecting party should be made aware of); thus, perhaps a prudent approach would be to hold payments until the ruling by the Court (whether now or at conclusion). 

 But, I haven’t found anything in concrete. Any other input from the listserv?

Ramón E Ortiz-Vélez
Attorney at Law
Ortiz Gosalia PLLC
15446 Bel-Red Rd, Suite 101
Redmond, WA 98052
Voice: (425)633-2004
Fax: (425)748-3940
Email: rortiz at ortizgosalialaw.com <x-msg://7/rortiz@ortizgosalialaw.com>
Web: www.ortizgosalialaw.com <http://www.ortizgosalialaw.com/>

-- 
> THIS EMAIL MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT/ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION:  This e-mail and any attachments thereto may contain confidential attorney work product and may be subject to the attorney-client communication privilege.  They are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain both legally privileged and/or sensitive protected information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.  If you receive this e-mail in error please immediately notify me at rortiz at ortizgosalialaw.com <x-msg://7/ramon@ortizvondralaw.com> and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof.
> 
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE:  Treasury Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice, to the extent this communication contains any statement of tax advice, such statement is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of, or as the basis for, avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on that person.

> On May 1, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Jared E. Adams <jared at condieadams.com> wrote:
> 
> I didn’t get any responses on my question below. I thought I’d give it a second try as there was interest from others who’ve encountered the same issue.
>  
> PR was appointed and granted non-intervention powers. Later, multiple interested parties filed Requests for Special Notice under RCW 11.28.240, requesting (among other things) notice prior to paying PR and attorney’s fees. I mailed a notice of intent to pay PR and attorney’s fees to all interested parties, and one interested party filed an objection.  
>  
> My question is, what is the effect of the objection?  At first glance, it appears that the PR can still be paid and pay the attorney, and the objection only preserves the objecting party’s right to contest the fees at closing.  Is that correct, or does filing the objection have a greater impact (perhaps preclude the payment of fees without a hearing)?
>  
> Does anyone know offhand? Is there a statute on point?
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Jared
>  
>  
> Jared E. Adams, JD, LL.M.
>  
> Condie & Adams, PLLC
> 611 4th Avenue, Suite A
> Kirkland, WA  98033
> (voice):  (425) 450-1040 
> (fax):  (425) 450-1041
> (email): jared at condieadams.com <mailto:jared at condieadams.com>
> (web): www.condieadams.com <http://www.condieadams.com/>
>  
> Unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
>  
> PLEASE READ THIS ENTIRE DISCLAIMER
> This message is from the Law Office of CONDIE & ADAMS, PLLC, and is intended only for the addressee.  The information contained in this message is privileged, confidential, and protected by the attorney-client or attorney work product privileges.  Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, disclosure or use of such information is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by return e-mail or you may call our office at (425) 450-1040. Nothing in this message should be interpreted as a digital or electronic signature that can be used to authenticate a contract or other legal document.
>  
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt <http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20150501/bbe766b6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20150501/bbe766b6/image.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: unknown.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4104 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20150501/bbe766b6/unknown.jpg>