[WSBAPT] Effect of adding a notarized codicil to a will that isnot self-proving

Tom J. Westbrook tjw at w3net.net
Mon Jun 1 14:22:18 PDT 2015


Now there's a very practical solution!

 

Regards, Tom

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Paul Neumiller
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 2:05 PM
To: 'WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv'
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Effect of adding a notarized codicil to a will
that isnot self-proving

 

With the magic of text processing, why not just replace the 

Will? 

 

 

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Sarah Jael Dion
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 1:45 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Subject: [WSBAPT] Effect of adding a notarized codicil to a will that is
not self-proving

 

Hi Listmates!

 

I am in need of guidance from more experienced estate planning
attorneys! 

 

I have a client with a will that was not notarized, and is therefore not
self-proving. I have been retained to draft a codicil to make some
changes to her will. I was wondering whether, if I draft the codicil
such that it republishes the will, I can cure the lack of notarization
in the original document? Would this be effective? I looked at the RCW
and didn't see any guidance there. 

 

Thanks in advance for any thoughts! 

 

Sarah Jael Dion

 

Dion Law PLLC


206-550-4005

sarah at dionlaw.com

dionlaw.com

 

This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for
whom this message is intended, please notify me immediately and delete
the message. Please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20150601/63dc68b3/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list