[WSBAPT] Clerk's Action Filed TEDRA Agreement

[John J. Sullivan]

My thought is if it's an Order the Clerk will follow it. 

John Sullivan

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 17, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Eric Nelsen <Eric at sayrelawoffices.com> wrote:
> 
> Never tried that! And I have no answer for you but I think it's a very interesting question.
> 
> Are the parties effectively the "judge" in that circumstance, who appoints "any suitable person" as PR? And say the parties agree to appoint someone who is statutorily disqualified--what effect? Is the order void, voidable? Do the parties get to decide on bond as well?
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Eric
> 
> Eric C. Nelsen
> SAYRE LAW OFFICES, PLLC
> 1320 University St
> Seattle WA  98101-2837
> phone 206-625-0092
> fax 206-625-9040
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of John J. Sullivan
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 10:52 AM
> To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
> Subject: [WSBAPT] Clerk's Action Filed TEDRA Agreement
> 
> Listmates:
> 
> In an intestate probate I'm using a nonjudicial TEDRA Agreement to accomplish several things, including replacing the Administrator. 
> 
> As we know, when you file one in a probate it has the force and effect of a court order. My question: in that case will the Clerk follow it if instructed to issue new Letters to the substitute Administrator in King County even though the parties sign it rather than the judge?
> 
> Anyone try this?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> John J. Sullivan
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt