[WSBAPT] NIP Notice & Lost Will?

[Bryce Dille]

I have had commissioners in Pierce county require a notice of hearing to
all heirs to establish will where original destroyed or lost after
decedents death.

 

This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and
may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s).  If this
matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender
immediately.

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we hereby
inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication
(including attachments, if any) is not intended or written to be used, and
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any matter addressed herein.

 

Bryce H. Dille 

Campbell, Dille, Barnett & Smith,  PLLC

P.O. Box 488

Puyallup, WA  98371

Voice:  253.848.3513

Fax: 253.845.4941

bryced at cdb-law.com

 

Business Entity Creation and Management

Business, Government and Tax Law

Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium
Development

Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including Performing
Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator

Estate and Trust Planning & Administration, Including Planning for
Business Succession 

Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments

Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures

 

From: wsbapt-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbapt-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of John J. Sullivan
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 3:16 PM
To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBAPT] NIP Notice & Lost Will?

 

List mates:

 

I have an Oso victim probate to open with a Will where the original was
lost in the slide. Decedent unmarried. One of three kids - the one named
first in the copy of the Will - is petitioning to be PR. The copy grants
NIP. 

 

Do I have to give notice of Petition for NIP? I'm thinking not under RCW
11.68.041 because the Petitioner is named first in Will that will be
admitted to probate. Seems the remedy if needed is to challenge the Will. 

 

Any contrary opinions?

 

Thanks,

John Sullivan

Sent from my iPhone

 

 

=======================

- To contact the list administrator, send a message to:
webmaster at wsbarppt.com

- To unsubscribe, send a new email addressed to: imail at lists.wsbarppt.com,
with the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe wsbapt - OR -
send a message to webmaster at wsbarppt.com asking that you be removed from
the wsbapt list.

Information provided on this list should not be considered legal advice.
As with all lists - let the reader beware! No warranties or
representations are made as to the accuracy of any information provided.
All opinions and comments in this message represent the views of the
author and do not necessarily have the endorsement of the Washington State
Bar Association nor its officers or agents. 

=======================


- To contact the list administrator, send a message to:
webmaster at wsbarppt.com

- To unsubscribe, send a new email addressed to: imail at lists.wsbarppt.com,
with the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe wsbapt - OR -
send a message to webmaster at wsbarppt.com asking that you be removed from
the wsbapt list.

Information provided on this list should not be considered legal advice.
As with all lists - let the reader beware! No warranties or
representations are made as to the accuracy of any information provided.
All opinions and comments in this message represent the views of the
author and do not necessarily have the endorsement of the Washington State
Bar Association nor its officers or agents. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 8506 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20140509/b598ecee/winmail.dat>