[WSBAPT] Community Property- probate question

Sam Furgason sam at furgasons.com
Fri Mar 7 15:42:04 PST 2014


Q1: I believe that to be correct. Al Montgomery, of Montgomery, Purdue,
Blankenship & Austin (www.mpba.com) was involved years ago in obtaining a
Letter Ruling along those lines. He also wrote “Underfunded Testamentary
Trusts and IRAs: Are Non-Pro Rata Distributions An Answer?,” Fall 1997
Real Property, Probate and Trust Section Newsletter. You could contact his
office (I’m taking liberties here) and ask for a reference to the Letter
Ruling.

 

Q2: I don’t see any harm, but don’t think such language is necessary, as I
believe you can accomplish the same objective under the powers granted to
PRs and Trustees by statute. 

One thing I have done, in smaller estates where tax issues don’t call for
a different action, however, is to have the decedent gift to the surviving
spouse the decedent’s one-half interest in any IRAs and Qualified Plans of
which the survivor is the participant. That’s done to prevent forcing the
survivor to liquidate plan assets in order to fund a decedent’s trust
where the total estate is largely tax-deferred arrangements. Those
situations tend to arise where the estate size is below federal and state
exemption limits. Since in today’s tax climate the survivor can hold up to
$2,000,000+, and where the surviving spouse can gift much more under
federal law, post-mortem planning can deal with the occasional problematic
situation. 

S 

This message is offered as part of discussions on an attorneys' list
serve.  It may include inaccuracies, unresearched comments, and
speculation. This information does not constitute legal advice, but is
provided solely as extemporaneous remarks. You may not rely on it, but
should instead seek advice from a skilled practitioner before attempting
to apply the information to any actual fact situation. 

Sam Furgason

Samuel L. Furgason, Inc., P.S.

Estate Practice Limited to Existing Clients

Office Address:

800 Bellevue Way N.E., Suite 400

Bellevue, WA 98004

Mail to:

PO Box 102

Medina, WA 98039-0102

Cell: (425) 445-9909 (direct line)

Office: (425) 649-1122 (receptionist)

www.furgasons.com 

sam at furgasons.com 

 

 

 

From: wsbapt-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbapt-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Donna Calf Robe
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 2:02 PM
To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBAPT] Community Property- probate question

 

Greetings:

 

Facts and legal assumptions: PR is surviving spouse with non-intervention
powers.  A PR with non-interventions powers can make non-pro rata
distributions of property from an estate.  A PR also administers the
community property.  However, Washington follows the “item theory” of
community property, where each spouse is treated as owning a half interest
in each community asset (rather than the “aggregate theory” where each
spouse owns an undivided interest in the community as a whole, which
allows for a non-pro rata division of community property.)  In present
case, much of community assets are retirement accounts (primarily IRAs in
PR/H’s name).  PR wants to allocate non-retirement CP account assets to
estate and IRAs to himself.  Estate assets will pass to spousal trust.
According to the probate deskbook (citing to Carrieres v. Comm’r) a
non-pro rata distribution of community property between SS and estate
should not result in a taxable exchange.        

 

Question  1: So H can allocate his ½ interest in non-retirement account to
estate, in exchange for retaining full interest in retirement account in
his name (of equal value) and then entire non-retirement account can pass
to trust, correct? 

 

Question 2: I read a suggestion that a better option (for the future use)
is to have testator include power in Will that PR can make non-prorate
distributions and use aggregate method in distribution of CP, and say that
to the extent possible, the decedent’s interest in the surviving spouses
IRA should be allocated to SS in any non-prorata distribution.  Are others
including this language in their Wills, when appropriate?

 

Thanks,

 

Donna

 

Donna M. Calf Robe

Attorney at Law

2722 Eastlake Ave. E., Ste. 200

Seattle, Washington 98102-3143

Phone (206) 324-4300, extension 113

FAX (206) 324-3106

 

The information transmitted in this e-mail message and attachments is
attorney-client information, is privileged or confidential material and is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. You are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, review by or
taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this e-mail
information by unauthorized persons is strictly prohibitedIf you have
received this transmission in error, immediately notify the sender by
reply e-mail and permanently delete this transmission and all copies
including attachments.  

 

 

=======================

- To contact the list administrator, send a message to:
webmaster at wsbarppt.com

- To unsubscribe, send a new email addressed to: imail at lists.wsbarppt.com,
with the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe wsbapt - OR -
send a message to webmaster at wsbarppt.com asking that you be removed from
the wsbapt list.

Information provided on this list should not be considered legal advice.
As with all lists - let the reader beware! No warranties or
representations are made as to the accuracy of any information provided.
All opinions and comments in this message represent the views of the
author and do not necessarily have the endorsement of the Washington State
Bar Association nor its officers or agents. 

=======================


- To contact the list administrator, send a message to:
webmaster at wsbarppt.com

- To unsubscribe, send a new email addressed to: imail at lists.wsbarppt.com,
with the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe wsbapt - OR -
send a message to webmaster at wsbarppt.com asking that you be removed from
the wsbapt list.

Information provided on this list should not be considered legal advice.
As with all lists - let the reader beware! No warranties or
representations are made as to the accuracy of any information provided.
All opinions and comments in this message represent the views of the
author and do not necessarily have the endorsement of the Washington State
Bar Association nor its officers or agents. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 10454 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20140307/85cb3df5/winmail.dat>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list