<div dir="ltr"><table width="600" class="gmail-x_layout-300 gmail-x_te-600" style="padding:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td width="600" class="gmail-x_layout-300 gmail-x_large-summary-first" style="margin:0px;padding:8px 0px 16px;text-align:left;color:rgb(51,51,51);line-height:22px;font-family:georgia,times,serif;font-size:16px;font-weight:normal"><div>NY Times, Nov. 11</div><div><br></div><div>Hillary Clinton didn’t just win the popular vote. She won it by a substantial margin. </div></td></tr><tr><td width="600" class="gmail-x_layout-300 gmail-x_large-summary-first" style="margin:0px;padding:0px 0px 16px;text-align:left;color:rgb(51,51,51);line-height:22px;font-family:georgia,times,serif;font-size:16px;font-weight:normal">By the time all the ballots are counted, she seems likely to be ahead by more than 2 million votes and more than 1.5 percentage points, <a style="color:rgb(50,104,145);text-decoration:underline" href="http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=pMJKdIFVI6pehkIEQ5/wRr6MZeaebV9ey6JTj6EssbnkGPFwrHQAyyTmM3EOBy+A6iORXC/pWMs=&campaign_id=69&instance_id=86172&segment_id=98021&user_id=4a205c5a62f3a4293ec5342704c0aac0&regi_id=29749741" target="_blank">according to</a> my Times colleague Nate Cohn. She will have won by a wider percentage margin than not only Al Gore in <a style="color:rgb(50,104,145);text-decoration:underline" href="http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=gTrU3W/9enTENHkvqbCdzZgkiTHF9UbCDD4W0GhG39P5Eyf7TltaK0BpBJHmP9mI6/jeDZp5NGKCpVGSwJxHiepw3hduVzKff3iiQHZx7X4=&campaign_id=69&instance_id=86172&segment_id=98021&user_id=4a205c5a62f3a4293ec5342704c0aac0&regi_id=29749741" target="_blank">2000</a> but also Richard Nixon in <a style="color:rgb(50,104,145);text-decoration:underline" href="http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=gTrU3W/9enTENHkvqbCdzZgkiTHF9UbCDD4W0GhG39P5Eyf7TltaK0BpBJHmP9mI6PkjHcl220G0ujhkK0RiYepw3hduVzKff3iiQHZx7X4=&campaign_id=69&instance_id=86172&segment_id=98021&user_id=4a205c5a62f3a4293ec5342704c0aac0&regi_id=29749741" target="_blank">1968</a> and John F. Kennedy in <a style="color:rgb(50,104,145);text-decoration:underline" href="http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=gTrU3W/9enTENHkvqbCdzZgkiTHF9UbCDD4W0GhG39P5Eyf7TltaK0BpBJHmP9mI6PkjHcl220GCpVGSwJxHiepw3hduVzKff3iiQHZx7X4=&campaign_id=69&instance_id=86172&segment_id=98021&user_id=4a205c5a62f3a4293ec5342704c0aac0&regi_id=29749741" target="_blank">1960</a>. </td></tr></tbody></table><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>   <div style="width:auto;height:auto">   <div> <div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt"><div><span style="font-size:13.33px">A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in. </span><br style="font-size:13.33px"><br style="font-size:13.33px"><span style="font-size:13.33px">-Greek proverb</span></div><div><br>
“Enlightenment is man’s emergence from his self-imposed immaturity. 
Immaturity is the inability to use one’s understanding without guidance 
from another. This immaturity is self- imposed when its cause lies not 
in lack of understanding, but in lack of resolve and courage to use it 
without guidance from another. Sapere Aude! ‘Have courage to use your 
own understand-ing!—that is the motto of enlightenment.<br>
<br>
--Immanuel Kant<br>
<br><br></div></span></font></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>