<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">It might have taken that long to find and sort out 645 pertinent e-mails from the e-mail archives. The investigation into the Boise Center real estate deals took considerably longer. I'm sure the university responded affirmatively within 10 days--it probably just took longer to do the work. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">And yes, public agencies are allowed to charge for their costs in responding. Here's the Attorney General's take:</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Question No. 13: What fees may be charged for the cost of copying
public records?
Answer: The concept of the law is that examination and copying of
public records is part of the public business, already funded by
taxpayers. An agency may establish a copying fee schedule, which “may not exceed the actual cost to the agency of copying the record .
. . .” The section contains an exception to preserve fees already
established by other laws, such as recorders’ fees and fees for court
records. Some state and local agencies provide information in the form
of computer tapes and disks. The law permits charging for the
“direct cost of copying the information in that form. The
language of the law regarding the cost of providing computer or
similar records is rendered somewhat unclear, however, by language,
which also allows the agency to collect “the standard cost, if any, for
selling the same information in the form of a publication. It is the
belief of the attorney general’s office that this language permits a
public agency to offer the requested information in an already printed
publication, and to charge the standard cost of selling the
publication.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"> Question No. 14: May the agency recover the cost of mailing or
faxing copies of public records?
Answer: The law requires an agency to provide public records to
members of the public; the agency is not required to send the records
to the person making the request. The law does not prevent the
recovery of actual mailing or telecommunications costs if there is a
request to mail or fax information to someone. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Question No. 15: What fees may be charged for any labor costs
incurred in locating, redacting, copying, and providing access to
public records?
Answer: Agencies may establish a fee to recover such labor costs
for voluminous or complex requests, or requests that involve
locating archival information. In addition, if an agency must incur additional expense to
provide access to records during other than normal working hours, or
requires the services of outside contract copying companies, or overtime on the part of its own employees, the agency may require advance payment to compensate for this additional expense.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Question No. 16: Are all members of the public required to pay
copying fees and labor costs?
Answer: Agencies are allowed to waive any cost or fee for copies
or labor when the requester demonstrates an inability to pay, when
the request “[i]s not primarily in the individual interest of the
requester including, but not limited to, the requester’s interest in
litigation in which the requester is or may become a party,” or
“demonstrates that the requester’s examination and/or copying of
public records [i]s likely to contribute significantly to the public’s
understanding of the operations or activities of the government.”</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Question No. 17: May the agency require advance payment of fees?
Answer: Agencies are allowed to require advance payment of the
costs of copying and labor costs.<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"> </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><font size="2">Ron Force<br>Moscow Idaho USA</font></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Saundra Lund <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:v2020@ssl1.fastmail.fm" target="_blank">v2020@ssl1.fastmail.fm</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#44546a">Since when did it become acceptable at the University of Idaho to use public records requests as a source of revenue?! And since when did it become acceptable at the UI to thumb its nose at the response times specified in Idaho Public Records Law?!<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#44546a"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:blue"><a href="http://www.idahostatesman.com/sports/college/university-of-idaho/article104963721.html" target="_blank"><span style="color:blue">http://www.idahostatesman.com/<wbr>sports/college/university-of-<wbr>idaho/article104963721.html</span></a><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#44546a"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#44546a">“</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#333333">The university charged the Tribune $911.14 to furnish the public records, which included 645 email communications sent by, and received by, both Staben and Spear. On May 3, university general counsel responded to an initial email sent by the Tribune, affirming the UI was in receipt of the records request. General counsel began collecting the emails on May 19, but didn't make them available until Aug. 29. According to Idaho law, public records requests must be granted or denied within 10 working days of the request.”</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#44546a"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#44546a"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#44546a">It seems to me public institutions that have nothing nefarious to hide would hide nothing, and they certainly wouldn’t view as adversaries those trying to examine public records, which is our <b>right</b> to do. Nor would they erect insane financial barriers to public records access.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#44546a"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#44546a">As Idaho’s Attorney General has written, “Open government is the cornerstone of a free society. The Idaho Legislature affirmed Idaho’s commitment to open government by enacting the Idaho public records law in 1990. The public records law protects each citizen’s right to monitor the actions of state and local government entities by providing access to government records.”<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#44546a"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#44546a">I cannot help but wonder what else the UI is so desperately trying to keep hidden from the public eye </span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:#44546a">L</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#44546a"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#44546a"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#44546a"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#44546a"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#44546a">Saundra Lund<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#44546a">Moscow, ID<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#44546a"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#44546a">I hold that, the more helpless a creature, the more entitled it is to protection by man from cruelty of man.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#44546a">~ Mahatma Ghandi<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#44546a"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#44546a"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div></div><br>==============================<wbr>=========================<br>
List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>
<a href="http://www.fsr.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
mailto:<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
==============================<wbr>=========================<br></blockquote></div><br></div>