<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 6/16/2016 4:29 PM, Moscow Cares wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CFF7DF26-8F28-44D9-9368-3589AC3C9688@moscow.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<div>The basic concepts remain, Area Man . . .</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">When ownership/possession of a
vehicle is transferred, title and registration of that vehicle
are reissued reflecting the new owner of that vehicle. This
same procedure MUST apply to firearms.</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">If a person is not considered safe
enough to board a plane, (s)he should (also) not be permitted to
own a firearm.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I'm not so sure there is a strong, direct relationship between
whether a person with flight restrictions imposed by law is
necessarily a more dangerous person with respect to firearms
ownership or usage. I do think that the national information
connection that can be more easily created through a no-fly list
facilitated by the airline industry has been selected as an
available crutch in the absence of a more appropriate information
source.<br>
<br>
An alternative registration system with a national scope could
be accomplished through a federal reporting system, perhaps as an
adjunct to the Treasury Department's Revenue Service. Some weapons
owners aver that their security is increased via firearms. By
expanding the security concept to inclusion of financial security
bases, and considering that, as with automotive vehicle usage,
firearm usage has demonstrated a non-trivial loss of human lives, so
increased security opportunities do infer the desirability of a
national firearm registration and transference procedure could have
some value.<br>
<br>
Another benefit of a federal government based registration
system is that citizens likely could have more input and impact on
how such a system would be administered, as opposed to privately
based registration systems, which could be more restrictive, and,
considering profit motives, more expensive throughout the firearms
information economy.<br>
<br>
<br>
Ken<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>