<div dir="ltr"><div>Another important principle in the justice system that should be addressed if we are to truly have a "Justice" system and not a system often dominated by prosecutors who view winning rather than justice as their main goal, is embodied in the SCOTUS <em>Brady v. Maryland</em>, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) decision. involving due process. Apparently the Brady decision is not followed consistently by prosecutors in our justice system; winning, not justice, often dominates prosecutorial conduct..</div><div><br></div><div>The following website offers discussion of this issue: I pasted in a few paragraphs, but the discussion beyond that is quite long . It is dated Aug. 20, 2015, and I don't know what new legal developments have happened since then:</div><div><br></div><div>Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett</div><div>---------------------------------------</div><div><br></div><div><font size="4">Supreme Court Should Take Action To Rehabilitate Brady Rule in Georgiou v. United States</font></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://securitiesdiary.com/2015/08/20/supreme-court-should-take-action-to-rehabilitate-brady-rule-in-georgiou-v-united-states/">http://securitiesdiary.com/2015/08/20/supreme-court-should-take-action-to-rehabilitate-brady-rule-in-georgiou-v-united-states/</a></div><div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0)"><br></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">Justice requires that the Supreme Court shore up the foundations of one of its landmark due process cases, <em>Brady v. Maryland</em>, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). Otherwise, <em>Brady</em>, one of the seminal due process cases of the 20<sup><font size="2">th</font></sup> Century, will be “more honor’d in the breach than the observance.”</span></div><div><p><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">In <em>Brady</em>, the Court ruled that prosecutors could not hide material exculpatory evidence from defendants. It is founded on the simple concept that a fair trial requires that a jury be presented with unbiased evidence, and the Government cannot, consistent with due process, prevent important exculpatory evidence from reaching the jury.</span></p><p><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">Over the years, prosecutors have largely resisted the concept that they share evidence in their possession that could assist the defense. This reflects a fundamentally flawed approach to the criminal justice process – too many prosecutors view winning a prosecution as the ultimate goal, when in fact achieving justice – win or lose – is the <em>sine qua non </em>of the criminal justice system of which they are part and parcel.</span></p><p><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">It is well-known that obtaining exculpatory evidence from prosecutors can be like pulling their teeth, and it has been documented that the failure to follow the simple <em>Brady</em> mandate is a common occurrence. The courts, which are entrusted to assure the <em>Brady</em> rule is followed, have been unduly neglectful of this key oversight role, showing an unseemly willingness to accept <em>Brady </em>violations under a range of rationalizations.</span></p></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Nicholas Gier <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ngier006@gmail.com" target="_blank">ngier006@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><font face="georgia, serif">Greetings:</font></div><div><font face="georgia, serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="georgia, serif">For those who do not take the Daily News below is my biweekly column. It also appeared in the Sandpoint Reader and the Los Cabos Daily News. It may appear soon in the Idaho State Journal in Pocatello.</font></div><div><font face="georgia, serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="georgia, serif">I'm grateful to our very own Sunil Ramalingam who led me to the best contacts for this column.</font></div><div><font face="georgia, serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="georgia, serif">Happy Spring (there are goslings in the new UI Arboretum!),</font></div><div><font face="georgia, serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="georgia, serif">Nick</font></div><div><font face="georgia, serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="georgia, serif"><br></font></div><div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><p align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"><b><span style="line-height:14.72px"><font face="georgia, serif">The Nation’s Public Defender Crisis</font></span></b></p><p align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"><b><span style="line-height:14.72px"><font face="georgia, serif"><br></font></span></b></p><p align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"><font face="georgia, serif"><br></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="line-height:14.72px"><font face="georgia, serif"> For almost a century the American Civil Liberties Union has been in the forefront in protecting the people’s constitutional rights. For this column I will focus on the Sixth Amendment, which guarantees full due process to criminal defendants and their right to legal counsel.</font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="line-height:14.72px"><font face="georgia, serif"><br></font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="georgia, serif"><span style="line-height:14.72px"> <span style="color:black">In the 1963 case <i>Gideon vs. Wainwright</i> Supreme Court rendered a unanimous decision clarifying the right to counsel. </span></span><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px">Justice Hugo Black wrote that “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person hauled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.” </span><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px"></span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="georgia, serif"><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px"><br></span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="georgia, serif"><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px"> </span><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px">The ACLU has filed suits in Connecticut, Michigan, New York, Washington, Idaho, California, and most recently in Louisiana, arguing that these states have failed to provide adequate counsel for their indigent defendants. </span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="georgia, serif"><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px"><br></span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:0.5in"><font face="georgia, serif"><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px">On June 17, 2015, in its first action against an entire state,</span><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px"> the ACLU sued Idaho because its public defenders are “<span style="padding:0in;border:1pt windowtext">under resourced, overburdened, and often overworked.” </span>In addition to citing the lack of enough investigators and expert witnesses, the ACLU suit also states that “our plaintiffs have had to go before a judge for bail hearings, and even to enter pleas of guilty and be sentenced, without a lawyer present.” Many of them sit in jail because they cannot afford bail.</span></font></p><p style="margin:0in 0in 18.65pt;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in"><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in;font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:12.8px"><br></span></p><p style="margin:0in 0in 18.65pt;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in"><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in;font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:12.8px">In July 2015 the ACLU filed yet another suit against Fresno County, where an under staffed public defender office serves 25,000 clients. According to an ACLU news release, plaintiff Peter Yepez “did not see a public defender until he had spent almost a month in jail. He had nine different public defenders between his arraignment and sentencing, some of whom told him they did not have time to work on his case and advised him to plead guilty despite strong evidence that he was innocent.”</span><br></p><p style="margin:0in 0in 18.65pt;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in"><font face="georgia, serif"><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in">On January 14 of this year the ACLU sued the City of New Orleans for severe deficiencies it its Public Defenders Office, one financed primarily by the fines that many of its poor clients have to pay.</span><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in"> </span><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in">Because of the crisis, 60 defendants sit in jail without legal representation, and the state-wide waiting list has grown to 2,300. In Louisiana and California a great majority of these defendants are people of color.</span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:0.5in"><font face="georgia, serif"><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px">There used to be ten public defenders in Vermilion Parish, Louisiana, but </span><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px">Natasha George is now the only </span><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px">one.</span><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px"> District Court Judge Jerome Winsberg despairs: “Things were not good before, but they are in a terrible place now.” The average public defender caseload used to be twice that of national standards, but it is now threefold.</span><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px"></span></font></p><p style="margin:0in 0in 18.65pt;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in"><span style="color:black"><font face="georgia, serif"> </font></span></p><p style="margin:0in 0in 18.65pt;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in"><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in;font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:12.8px">Returning now to Idaho, the Legislature passed two bills this session. One will hold the counties to higher standards for indigent legal representation, and it will allow the Public Defense Commission to take over the programs of any county that doesn’t meet them.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:0.5in"><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px"><font face="georgia, serif">The second bill allocates $5.4 million for the Commission, which heretofore had no funding at all. It provides $4.3 million for grants to counties that meet the new standards. The balance of the funds will go to extraordinary litigation, and there is $550,000 to encourage small counties to merge their services. </font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:0.5in"><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px"><font face="georgia, serif"><br></font></span></p><p style="margin:0in 0in 18.65pt;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in"><font face="georgia, serif"><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in">The bills have had the support of the Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the ACLU’s Kathy </span><span style="color:black;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in">Griesmyer announced that her organization was grateful for the new funding. However, she added: “We will be back here advocating for additional dollars as well as reminding folks that this is an incremental step in addressing deficiencies in the public defense system.”</span><br></font></p><p style="margin:0in 0in 18.65pt;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in"><span style="color:black"><font face="georgia, serif">Ian Thomson, former Executive Director of the Public Defense Commission, is less sanguine: “I would be encouraged if this were a first step towards meeting the challenge of our public defense problems, but I fear that this may be the last step.”</font></span></p><p style="margin:0in 0in 18.65pt;line-height:14.72px;text-indent:0.5in"><span style="color:black"><font face="georgia, serif">Nick Gier of Moscow taught philosophy at the University of Idaho for 31 years.</font></span></p></div><div style="margin:2px 0px 0px;font-size:12.8px"><div><img src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/images/cleardot.gif"></div></div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div>-- <br><div><div dir="ltr"><div> <div style="width:auto;min-height:auto"> <div> <div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt"><div><span style="font-size:13.33px">A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in. </span><br style="font-size:13.33px"><br style="font-size:13.33px"><span style="font-size:13.33px">-Greek proverb</span></div><div><br>
“Enlightenment is man’s emergence from his self-imposed immaturity.
Immaturity is the inability to use one’s understanding without guidance
from another. This immaturity is self- imposed when its cause lies not
in lack of understanding, but in lack of resolve and courage to use it
without guidance from another. Sapere Aude! ‘Have courage to use your
own understand-ing!—that is the motto of enlightenment.<br>
<br>
--Immanuel Kant<br>
<br><br></div></span></font></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</font></span></div>
<br>=======================================================<br>
List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>
<a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
mailto:<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
=======================================================<br></blockquote></div><br></div>