<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Roger - the gloom and doom is so-called 'religious freedom' being used to exert control over women's options for birth control coverage. If you want to make an argument against birth control coverage based on cost, then put up the numbers. Note that:<br><ul><li>Insurance companies aren't the ones pushing for dropping birth control likely because it's lower cost than prenatal care and birthing</li><li>Employers aren't basing their objections based on cost</li></ul><br><BR>Your comments regarding abstinence are just plain nutty. That's never worked for the simple fact that the vast majority of men and woman do not abstain. Get real.<BR><br><BR>-Scott<br><BR><br><div><hr id="stopSpelling">Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 21:26:40 -0700<br>To: vision2020@moscow.com; lmccollough@gmail.com<br>From: lfalen@turbonet.com<br>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] SCOTUS did not finish with the HL decision<br><br><title></title>
<div class="ecxiw_mail" dir="ltr"><div class="ecxiw_mail" dir="ltr"><div class="ecxiw_mail" dir="ltr"> <br><div class="ecxsignature"></div>
<div>Why the gloom and doom. It is not a disease like cancer that you have mostly no control over. It is the result of sex that except for rape is voluntary. A person can abstain, pay for their own control or go the Planed Parenthood. I understand they give away birth control products free.</div>
<div>This from my oldest daughter- If a women's preferred method of birth control is to keep her clothes on, will her employer pay for her clothes?</div>
<div>Roger<br> </div>
<blockquote class="ecxreply_block" style="padding-left:1em;font-family:tahoma,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:13px;border-left-color:blue;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;" dir="ltr">
<hr size="1">-----Original Message-----<br>From: "Lynn McCollough" <<a href="mailto:lmccollough@gmail.com">lmccollough@gmail.com</a>><br>To: <a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>Date: 07/08/14 07:42<br>Subject: [Vision2020] SCOTUS did not finish with the HL decision<br><br><div dir="ltr"> <div>On Thurday, SCOTUS filed an injunction that widely expanded an employers ability to not cover birth control for women. This decision will have much greater impact than their decision regarding the Hobby Lobby filing.<br><a href="http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/iowa-view/2014/07/08/12325985/" target="_blank">http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/iowa-view/2014/07/08/12325985/</a><br><br> </div>It is a shame this isn't getting the media coverage.<br> </div>
<hr>=======================================================<br>List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br> <a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.net</a><br> mailto:<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>=======================================================</blockquote> </div></div></div>
<br>=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
=======================================================</div> </div></body>
</html>