<div dir="ltr">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/"><img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif" alt="The New York Times" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="0"></a>
</div>
<div class="">
</div>
</div>
<br clear="all"><hr align="left" size="1">
<div class="">August 10, 2013</div>
<h1>Amid Pipeline Debate, Two Costly Cleanups Forever Change Towns</h1>
<h6 class="">By
<span>
<a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/f/dan_frosch/index.html" rel="author" title="More Articles by DAN FROSCH"><span>DAN FROSCH</span></a></span></h6>
<div id="articleBody">
<p>
MARSHALL, Mich. — As the Obama administration inches closer to a
decision on whether to approve construction of the much-debated Keystone
XL pipeline, costly cleanup efforts in two communities stricken by oil
spills portend the potential hazards of transporting heavy Canadian
crude. </p>
<p>
It has been three years since an Enbridge Energy pipeline ruptured beneath this small western Michigan town, <a title="Times article." href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/28/us/28brfs-800000GALLON_BRF.html">spewing more than 840,000 gallons</a>
of thick oil sands crude into the Kalamazoo River and Talmadge Creek,
the largest oil pipeline failure in the country’s history. Last March,
an <a title="Times article." href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/us/oil-pipeline-ruptures-in-arkansas.html">Exxon Mobil pipeline burst</a> in Mayflower, Ark., releasing thousands of gallons of oil and forcing the evacuation of 22 homes. </p>
<p>
Both pipeline companies have spent tens of millions of dollars trying to
recover the heavy crude, similar to the product Keystone XL would
carry. River and floodplain ecosystems have had to be restored, and
neighborhoods are still being refurbished. Legal battles are being
waged, and residents’ lives have been forever changed. </p>
<p>
“All oil spills are pretty ugly and not easy to clean up,” said <a href="http://www.zoology.msu.edu/all-faculty/stephen-hamilton.html">Stephen K. Hamilton</a>,
a professor of aquatic ecology at Michigan State University who is
advising the Environmental Protection Agency and the state on the
cleanup in Marshall. “But this kind of an oil is even harder to clean up
because of its tendency to stick to surfaces and its tendency to become
submerged.” </p>
<p>
Before July 26, 2010, hardly anyone in Marshall had heard of <a href="http://www.enbridgepartners.com/">Enbridge Energy Partners</a>, a Houston firm whose parent company is based in Calgary, Alberta. </p>
<p>
On a recent midsummer morning, the Kalamazoo looked almost the way it
once did. Towering oak trees draped over the water in the heat. Hawks
patrolled the deep green riverbanks. An elderly couple lugged fishing
tackle toward a shady area. If not for two motorboats whirring
downstream and three men probing the water with poles, there would have
been no sign that anything had gone wrong. </p>
<p>
Much of Kalamazoo’s plant and animal life has returned. But ridding the
water of all the oil — some of which sank to the river floor and
continues to generate a kaleidoscopic sheen — has proved elusive. Though
a 40-mile stretch of the river has reopened after being closed for two
years and most of the oil has been recovered or has evaporated, vestiges
of the spill are everywhere. “For Sale” signs dot the rolling
cornfields and soy farms. Once-coveted riverfront homes sit vacant.
</p>
<p>
Matt Davis, a real estate agent here, said he had struggled to sell
homes since the spill. “Enbridge hopes people forget,” Mr. Davis said.
“But this is my town. This is where I grew up. Enbridge isn’t from
around here. </p>
<p>
“We didn’t ask for them to have their pipeline burst in our backyard. Make it right. Take care of the mess you made.” </p>
<p>
In May, the E.P.A. found that Enbridge had drastically underestimated
the amount of oil still in the river. The agency estimated that 180,000
gallons had most likely drifted to the bottom, more than 100 times
Enbridge’s projection. It has ordered Enbridge to dredge sections of the
river where stubborn beads of oil remain submerged. </p>
<p>
The dredging started on July 30, and stretches of the river are being
closed again. Construction crews have rumbled onto the riverfront in
nearby Comstock Township, angering residents and business owners who
remain fearful of another accident. </p>
<p>
Jason Manshum, an Enbridge spokesman, said the company was working to
address the township’s concerns as it followed the orders of the E.P.A.
“This is the single-largest incident in the history of our
organization,” he said. “From the beginning, in July 2010, we said that
we would be committed to this community and the natural environment, for
as long as it would take to right the rupture that happened. About
three years later to the day, we’re still here.” </p>
<p>
Larry Bell, who owns Bell’s Brewery, one of the country’s largest craft
beer makers, was shocked earlier this summer to see workers clear a
staging area next to his brewery near Marshall. “We’re going to be
downwind of this thing,” said Mr. Bell, who filed a lawsuit last month
asserting that Enbridge did not get permission from the local
condominium association to build its dredge pad. </p>
<p>
“If those airborne contaminants come in, it’s going to get into our
ingredients,” Mr. Bell said. “We see that as irreparable. They can’t
compensate me for taking away my business.” </p>
<p>
Since the spill, Enbridge has become one of the largest landowners in
the area — buying out 154 residential properties within a 200-foot swath
that the company determined was most affected. By many accounts,
Enbridge paid a fair price and has begun to put some properties up for
sale. </p>
<p>
The company has also donated millions of dollars to build roads and
parks along the river. Still, the emotional scars of losing property run
deep. </p>
<p>
For nearly 30 years, Deb Miller and her husband owned a carpet store
along the Kalamazoo. After the spill, Enbridge offered to buy the
property but not the store, Ms. Miller said. Nearing retirement and
worried that the land’s value would plummet, the Millers liquidated
their business and sold the land. </p>
<p>
“We could have worked that store for another 10 years,” said Ms. Miller,
59, who now has two part-time jobs. “For us to physically move our
business at our age was more than we could fathom. It was an agonizing
decision.” </p>
<p>
The same sentiment echoes in Mayflower, Ark., a quiet, working-class
town of about 2,200 tucked among the wetlands and dogwood thickets near
Little Rock. </p>
<p>
On March 29, an Exxon Mobil pipeline burst near the Northwoods
subdivision, spilling an estimated 210,000 gallons of heavy Canadian
crude, coating a residential street with oil. Twenty-two homes were
evacuated. </p>
<p>
Now, four months later, the neighborhood of low-slung brick homes is
largely deserted, a ghostly column of empty driveways and darkened
windows, the silence broken only by the groan of heavy machinery pawing
at the ground as remediation continues. </p>
<p>
After E.P.A. monitoring found air quality to be safe, residents of 17 of
the homes were allowed back. But only a few have returned. </p>
<p>
“People here are still unsure about whether it’s safe for their
families,” said April Lane of the Faulkner County Citizens Advisory
Group, a community organization working with residents. </p>
<p>
Exxon has offered to buy the 22 evacuated homes, or to compensate owners
for diminished property value. The company also said it would buy 40
additional properties if the owners could not sell them within four
months. </p>
<p>
So far, Exxon has spent $2 million on temporary housing for residents
and more than $44 million on the cleanup, said Aaron Stryk, an Exxon
spokesman. </p>
<p>
“We can’t say it enough: We are so, so sorry this incident took place
and for the disruption and for the inconvenience that has taken place,”
Mr. Stryk said. “We are staying in Mayflower until the job is done.”
</p>
<p>
For some, the money cannot replace the lives they once led. </p>
<p>
Jimmy Arguello and his wife, Tiffany, lived in Northwoods for six years,
in the first home they owned, built by Mr. Arguello, a plumber, and his
friends. </p>
<p>
The day the pipeline broke, the Arguellos were told by the police to
pack for a few days. But for three months, the couple and their two
young sons stayed at hotels — six in all — before settling into an
apartment in nearby Conway. </p>
<p>
Exxon has paid their living expenses, but the impact on the family has
been “heartbreaking,” Mr. Arguello said. Worried about raising his
children near an oil spill, he has decided to sell his home to Exxon.
“It’s hard not to know where your family is going to go and where we’re
going to end up,” he said. “I built that house six years ago. And now
I’m not going back.” </p>
<p>
Ryan Senia, a 29-year-old engineer, is also selling to Exxon. Mr. Senia,
who has stayed at a friend’s house since being evacuated, said he
worried he would never be able to put his home on the market otherwise.
“Everyone you know is gone,” he said. </p>
<p>
During the last few months, several lawsuits have been filed on behalf
of dozens of residents who live both in and near the subdivision.
</p>
<p>
The State of Arkansas and the Justice Department have also filed a
claim, saying that the spill polluted waterways and that Exxon did not
immediately repair the pipeline. </p>
<p>
Exxon would not comment on pending litigation, Mr. Stryk said, adding
that it had been transparent in its clean up efforts. </p>
<p>
There is no sense of how long those efforts will continue. A protective
boom has been strung across Lake Conway; so far, no oil has reached it.
Workers were still searching for residual oil in a nearby marsh. </p>
<p>
And crews in Northwoods continue to monitor for oil that seeped into the
foundations of several homes. “We’re tired of it,” Mr. Arguello said.
“We’re ready for it to be over.” </p>
<p>
Here in Marshall, Enbridge projects that its total cleanup cost will run to nearly $1 billion. </p>
<p>
An E.P.A. spokeswoman, Anne Rowan, said that even after the company
dredges the Kalamazoo, about 162,000 gallons of oil will remain. It
cannot be recovered immediately without causing a significant adverse
impact to the river, Ms. Rowan said. </p>
<p>
Michigan’s Department of Environmental Quality, meanwhile, has undertaken a huge study to examine soil and sediment. </p>
<p>
Since the spills, the pipeline industry has emphasized that oil lines
remain safe and reliable, and that major spills are rare. </p>
<p>
“Are we satisfied? No,” said Peter T. Lidiak, the American Petroleum
Institute’s pipeline director. “We are trying to not have any releases
and not have properties damaged and people impacted. Because that’s not
the business we’re in.” </p>
<p>
For Deb Miller, the spill will forever haunt Marshall. </p>
<p>
“They can try and beautify along the river, but they can never give us
back all of our neighbors who have moved out,” Ms. Miller said. “There
are not enough zeros to pay us for what we’ve been through.” </p>
<div class="">
</div>
</div>
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<br><a href="mailto:art.deco.studios@gmail.com" target="_blank">art.deco.studios@gmail.com</a><br><br><img src="http://users.moscow.com/waf/WP%20Fox%2001.jpg"><br>
</div>