<div dir="ltr">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/"><img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif" alt="The New York Times" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="0"></a>
</div>
<div class="">
</div>
</div>
<br clear="all"><hr align="left" size="1">
<div class="">May 24, 2013</div>
<h1>Strategic Ignorance</h1>
<h6 class="">By
<span>
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/opinion/editorialboard.html" rel="author" title="More Articles by THE EDITORIAL BOARD"><span>THE EDITORIAL BOARD</span></a></span></h6>
<div id="articleBody">
<p>
In an age when knowledge is power, restricting knowledge is a power
grab, creating the conditions of ignorance that allow bias, ideology and
propaganda to flourish, unchallenged and unchecked. </p>
<p>
So it is with two pending Republican bills that seek to curtail or end
vital surveys by the Census Bureau and that could advance as early as
next month, when lawmakers consider the annual appropriation for the
Commerce Department, which includes the bureau’s budget. </p>
<p>
<a title="H.R. 1638" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c113:H.R.1638:">One bill</a>,
introduced in the House by Jeff Duncan of South Carolina, would
effectively end all surveys by the bureau, except for the decennial
census, and even that would be limited to counting noses — a silly
interpretation of the census’s mandate. Banning the surveys would make
it impossible to compile reliable data on employment, productivity,
health, housing, poverty, crime and the environment, to name a few of
the affected fields. </p>
<p>
This bill would be too wacky to worry about, but its lunacy makes the other know-nothing bill look moderate. <a title="H.R. 1078" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:h.r.1078:">That bill</a>,
introduced in the House by Ted Poe of Texas and in the Senate by Rand
Paul of Kentucky, targets the American Community Survey. <a title="History of ACS, Census Bureau" href="http://www.census.gov/history/www/programs/demographic/american_community_survey.html">Started in 2005</a>
to replace the long-form census, the survey is the indispensable source
of information on factors that define American life, including family
configurations, education levels, work and living arrangements, income
and insurance coverage. Credible information is the basis for a
responsive government, an efficient economy and, by extension, a
functional society. It also gives American policy makers and businesses a
competitive edge, because it encourages decisions based on hard data as
opposed to guesses or other faulty rationales that dominate in the
absence of credible data. </p>
<p>
About three million people receive the survey every year, and, as with
the census, answering it is required by law. Mr. Poe and Mr. Rand want
to make it voluntary, which would make the results less reliable, and
potentially worthless, because fewer people would answer and those who
did would not be a representative sample. </p>
<p>
Canada recently replaced its mandatory long-form census with a voluntary
survey — and now lives with the sorry results. To try to get an
adequate level of response, the voluntary survey was sent to one in
three Canadians instead of one in five, which increased costs. The
response rate plunged anyway, from 94 percent to 68 percent. In a
staggering one-fourth of Canadian communities, not enough people
responded to make the data usable. </p>
<p>
It may be months before President Obama’s nominees for Commerce
secretary and Census Bureau director are confirmed; in the meantime,
there is no one to defend the survey. That increases the chances that
the bill to make the survey voluntary could be slipped into the Commerce
Department appropriation or other legislation. The White House needs to
put someone prominent in charge of the issue now, or risk being caught
off guard later. </p><br clear="all"></div><br>-- <br>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<br><a href="mailto:art.deco.studios@gmail.com" target="_blank">art.deco.studios@gmail.com</a><br><br><img src="http://users.moscow.com/waf/WP%20Fox%2001.jpg"><br>
</div>