<div dir="ltr">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/"><img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif" alt="The New York Times" hspace="0" vspace="0" align="left" border="0"></a>
</div>
<div class="">
</div>
</div>
<br clear="all"><hr size="1" align="left">
<div class="">May 8, 2013</div>
<h1>Banks Still Behaving Badly</h1>
<h6 class="">By
<span>
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/opinion/editorialboard.html" rel="author" title="More Articles by THE EDITORIAL BOARD"><span>THE EDITORIAL BOARD</span></a></span></h6>
<div id="articleBody">
<p>
Attorney General Eric Schneiderman of New York <a title="A DealBook report" href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/05/06/new-york-to-sue-bank-of-america-and-wells-fargo-over-settlement-violations/">announced this week that he plans to sue</a>
Bank of America and Wells Fargo for failure to adhere to the terms of a
$26 billion settlement that was supposed to provide relief to
homeowners and end foreclosure abuses. </p>
<p>
The lawsuits are another sign that more than a year after the mortgage
settlement between five big banks and state and federal officials banks
are still mishandling foreclosures in ways to benefit themselves while
harming borrowers. Mr. Schneiderman is right to object, but the sad
truth is that a concerted government effort to hold banks accountable
has never materialized. </p>
<p>
Mr. Schneiderman said Bank of America and Wells Fargo have violated the
settlement’s mortgage servicing standards, which, among other
procedures, set timelines for processing borrowers’ requests for loan
modifications. The timelines are crucial because banks have been
notorious for losing and delaying paperwork, causing borrowers to incur
late fees and interest penalties while falling further behind. </p>
<p>
In some cases, such delays have actually pushed borrowers into
foreclosure by inflating loan balances. For banks, foreclosure can be
preferable to modifying a troubled loan because the late fees and
interest charges are paid to the bank when a seized home is sold.
</p>
<p>
The issues raised by Mr. Schneiderman are not the only ways in which the
settlement seems to be falling short. From data that have been compiled
so far, it appears that banks are directing much of the required relief
toward large mortgages, presumably for higher-income borrowers. That
would be another blow to lower-income borrowers, many of them
minorities, who were hit hardest by predatory lending and abusive
foreclosures. </p>
<p>
It also appears as though banks may be urging borrowers who owe more on
their mortgages than their homes are worth to sell their homes at a loss
via short sales when those borrowers could qualify for loan
modifications instead. In addition, there is evidence that banks may be
structuring the mortgage aid so that they get credit under the
settlement for taking action, even when the relief is insufficient to
prevent foreclosures. </p>
<p>
When <a title="A Times article from February 2012" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/business/states-negotiate-26-billion-agreement-for-homeowners.html">the settlement was reached last February</a>,
President Obama pledged to follow up with an expanded inquiry into
mortgage fraud to be conducted by a task force of state and federal
prosecutors and other law enforcement officials. The lackluster results
to date — two earlier lawsuits by Mr. Schneiderman and two bank
settlements with the Securities and Exchange Commission — might well
have happened without the task force. The Justice Department has yet to
bring a case of its own as part of the task force. </p>
<p>
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, meanwhile, has issued national
foreclosure rules for banks. Homeowner advocates had hoped that the
bureau would improve on the servicing standards in the settlement. But
the new rules appear aimed as much at preserving banks’ prerogatives as
empowering homeowners. </p>
<p>
Mr. Schneiderman’s lawsuits may be able to wrest better behavior from
the banks in the short run, especially if other state prosecutors follow
his lead. But the potential for continued abuses is still greater than
the promise of true accountability, reform and redress. </p><br clear="all"></div><br>-- <br>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<br><a href="mailto:art.deco.studios@gmail.com" target="_blank">art.deco.studios@gmail.com</a><br>
<br><img src="http://users.moscow.com/waf/WP%20Fox%2001.jpg"><br>
</div>