<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>From the Washington Post, Ezra Kline's <span style="font-style: italic;">Wonkblog:</span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;"><br></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;"><div style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal;">“Guns, gays and immigration -- it's too much,” an unnamed Senate Democrat <a href="http://link.email.washingtonpost.com/r/DME6KX/A7VZUR/AKCNEV/OQEJXR/S3QCSS/ZH/h" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(17, 85,
204);">reportedly</a> told the White House. “I can be with you on one or two of them, but not all three.” Judging from President Obama’s comments over the last two days, he didn’t find this particular excuse persuasive.</div><div style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal;">But it does seem to be the rationalization du jour on the Hill. I heard it from pro-gun bill staffers who said, hopefully, that the breakaways were simply husbanding political capital for immigration reform. Paul Kane got it <a href="http://link.email.washingtonpost.com/r/DME6KX/A7VZUR/AKCNEV/OQEJXR/UUS2RF/ZH/h" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204);">on the record</a> from Sen. Joe Manchin, who says he heard it while looking to whip support for his legislation.</div><div style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal;">It’s rare that the
psychodrama of the Senate comes on such full display. But to state the obvious, this isn’t just an explanation for a vote. It’s a salve for a guilty conscience. This is not the sort of rationalization that would be leaking from the chamber if senators were confident they’d done the right thing. It’s a rationalization for people who feel they did the wrong thing, and want to tell themselves it’s the cost for doing the right thing later, on an even larger scale.</div><div style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal;">American politicians talk often about the concept of “political courage.” This means, in general, voting for something your constituents, your allies, or powerful political interests won’t like. It’s a deeply self-serving idea. Every time it’s uttered, it underscores the idea that the work of the legislator is, in some way, tough and dangerous, and that those who do an
honest job of it are winning an epic struggle. It’s how politicians prime the rest of us to nod our heads when we hear them say that voting with their conscience and their best judgment in three tough votes in a row is simply too much.</div><div style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal;">At a Wall Street Journal breakfast yesterday, Manchin put the idea of political courage in a more appropriate context. He recalled a trip to Afghanistan with a handful of other governors. ”In Kabul, they let us meet with some of the provincial governors. One was a Taliban that had converted over to Karzai's side. Some of them could speak pretty good English. And I'll never forget this. We were talking to them one night at the embassy, and the one asked, out of the clear blue sky, ’what's the greatest danger or the greatest price you pay being a governor?’”</div><div style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34);
font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal;">“I thought about that, and I said, I guess either I could do something embarrassing and really embarrass my family, I could make a big mistake and hurt people unintentionally by a financial decision I made, or I could get defeated.”</div><div style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal;">“No expression [on his face]. No expression at all. He said, Can I tell you what I face every day? They try to kill my children. They try to kill my family. They try to kill me and any of my associates. That's what I face every day to be a governor.”</div><div style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal;">Think about that the next time you hear an anonymous senator complain that three votes on broadly popular issues are “too much.”</div></span></div></div></body></html>