<div><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/26/pacific-northwest-coal-exports_n_2952245.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/26/pacific-northwest-coal-exports_n_2952245.html</a></div><div> </div><div><p>
<b>AP</b>
|
By By PHUONG LE
<span style="display:block" class="posted-and-updated">
Posted: <span>03/25/2013 8:40 pm EDT</span>
</span>
</p></div><div><p>SEATTLE (AP) — The governors of Washington and Oregon are urging the
White House to evaluate the effects of greenhouse gasses that would be
emitted elsewhere if the nation's coal is exported.</p>
<p>In a joint letter sent Monday to the President's
Council on Environmental Quality, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and Oregon
Gov. John Kitzhaber called on the federal government to examine the
consequences on global air quality if five coal export terminals
proposed in Washington and Oregon ship up to 140 million tons of coal a
year from Montana and Wyoming's Powder River basin to hungry markets in
Asia.</p>
<p>Given that coal exports from the Northwest could result
in 240 million tons per year of carbon dioxide emissions, the
Democratic governors wrote, "it is hard to conceive that the federal
government would ignore the inevitable consequences of coal leasing and
coal export."</p>
<p>"We believe the decisions to continue and expand coal
leasing from federal lands and authorize the export of that coal are
likely to lead to long-term investments in coal generation in Asia, with
air quality and climate impacts in the United States that dwarf almost
any other action the federal government could take in the foreseeable
future," they wrote.</p>
<p>The governors said that the U.S. is poised to become a
significant supplier of coal to Asia, and they noted that coal is a
major source of global greenhouse gas emissions. They worried that
increase greenhouse gas emissions from burning of coal are causing
environmental and health costs in the U.S. and around the world.</p>
<p>Kitzhaber has previously asked federal officials to
study the environmental impacts of mining coal in Montana and Wyoming,
shipping it to the West Coast and burning it in Asia.</p>
<p>Former Gov. Chris Gregoire, a Democrat whom Inslee
replaced in January, had declined to take a position on coal exports,
saying she wanted the regulatory process to play out.</p>
<div id="ad_mid_article" class="ad_wrapper">The
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is reviewing three projects, including one
in Oregon at Port of Morrow in Boardman, and two in Washington in
Longview and north of Bellingham. No final decisions have been made on
related state permits for these terminals, the governors noted in their
letter.</div>
<p>Proponents of the projects say they will create jobs and generate millions in tax revenues.</p>
<p>Lauri Hennessey, a spokeswoman for Alliance for
Northwest Jobs & Exports, which includes U.S. coal producers, noted
that the U.S. Senate voted last week to oppose new requirements that
federal agencies consider greenhouse gas emissions in their analysis
under federal environmental law.</p>
<p>"This requirement would be particularly damaging in the
Northwest where trade and export are vital to the economy and support
good family-wage jobs," she said.</p>
<p>Project opponents want regulators to study the broader
effects of the projects, including increased train traffic, carbon
emissions from burning coal overseas and other health and environmental
concerns.</p>
<p>"Coal export would harm our air, water, and climate so
it makes sense to evaluate the impacts," Brett VandenHeuvel, executive
director of Columbia Riverkeeper said in a statement Monday.</p><p>----------------------------------------</p><p>Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett</p></div>