<div dir="ltr">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/"><img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif" alt="The New York Times" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="0"></a>
</div>
<div class="">
</div>
</div>
<br clear="all"><hr align="left" size="1">
<div class="">March 8, 2013</div>
<h1>Senators Bearing Arms</h1>
<h6 class="">By
<span>
<a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/gailcollins/index.html" rel="author" title="More Articles by GAIL COLLINS"><span>GAIL COLLINS</span></a></span></h6>
<div id="articleBody">
<p>
Whenever talk turns to gun control in Congress, lawmakers feel compelled to mention their love of weaponry. </p>
<p>
“I’m probably one of the few who have a pistol range in my backyard,”
said Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont on Thursday, as he led a meeting
of the Judiciary Committee on gun legislation. </p>
<p>
“I have an AR-15,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, referring to the nation’s best-known assault weapon. </p>
<p>
“I’m not going to do anything illegally with it,” Graham added. There
were no audible sighs of relief from the audience, but I am sure
everybody was glad to have the reassurance. </p>
<p>
People, do you think Congress is actually going to do anything about gun
violence in the wake of the Newtown shootings? Judiciary is going to
vote on two big proposals next week: a ban on assault weapons and an
expansion of gun purchase background checks. If the Democrats stick
together, the bills can pass on a party-line vote. But to go any
further, they need Republican support, and there wasn’t a whole lot of
it in evidence this week. </p>
<p>
Senator Dianne Feinstein, the chief sponsor of the assault weapons ban,
seemed less than optimistic. “I want to thank those who are with me,”
she said. “I don’t know that I can convince those who are not, but I
intend to keep trying.” She looked exhausted. At one point, she referred
to Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut as “Senator Delvanthal.” </p>
<p>
“Senator Feinstein has been consistent. She is sincere, and she has the
courage of her convictions and what more could you ask,” said Graham.
This may have been an attempt at consolation. Perhaps he was only being
incredibly patronizing by accident. </p>
<p>
The public’s interest in reducing gun violence may not have abated, but
some of the lawmakers seem to be trotting backward. After Newtown,
Senator Joe Manchin, the conservative Democrat from West Virginia, said:
“I don’t know anyone in the sporting or hunting arena that goes out
with an assault rifle.” He told CNN that he wanted to create a “dialogue
that would bring a total change,” adding, “and I mean a total change.”
</p>
<p>
Manchin now says that anybody who took that to mean he was favoring some
kind of ban on assault weapons totally misunderstood him. “I said
everything should be on the table,” he explained in a phone interview.
“Everything <em>is</em> on the table. I don’t agree with the things on the table, but they still have the right to put them on.” </p>
<p>
On the plus side, the Judiciary Committee approved a modest bill raising
the penalties for “straw purchasers” — people who buy guns in order to
give them to someone barred from making the purchase, like convicted
felons or Mexican drug runners. One Republican, Chuck Grassley of Iowa,
voted for it. However, Senator John Cornyn of Texas expressed concern
that it would “make it a serious felony for an American Legion employee
to negligently transfer a rifle or firearm to a veteran who, unknown to
the transferor, suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder.” </p>
<p>
Personally, I would rather not have American Legion employees
negligently transferring guns to anybody. But then I am not trying to
run for re-election in Texas without being primaried by the Tea Party.
</p>
<p>
The best hope for serious change involves fixing the background check
law so that people who buy weapons at gun shows, online, in flea markets
and other nonstore venues are included. Bipartisan negotiations seemed
to fizzle this week, but Manchin, who was among those backing out,
expressed confidence that something could still be worked out. And the
assault weapons bill might have a little better chance if it was less
complicated. (Feinstein’s bill lists 157 makes and models of guns that
are prohibited.) It might be easier to just go with the part banning
magazine clips that allow shooters to fire off 15, 30, 100 or more
bullets without reloading. </p>
<p>
You may be wondering what conceivable argument gun lovers could have
about hanging on to those monster bullet clips. For the answer, let us
turn to — yes! — Lindsey Graham. The senator from South Carolina wanted
to know what people were supposed to do with a lousy two-bullet shotgun
“in an environment where the law and order has broken down, whether it’s
a hurricane, national disaster, earthquake, terrorist attack,
cyberattack where the power goes down and the dam’s broken and chemicals
have been released into the air and law enforcement is really not able
to respond and people take advantage of that lawless environment.”
</p>
<p>
Do you think Graham spends a lot of time watching old episodes of
“Doomsday Preppers?” Does he worry about zombies? That definitely would
require a lot of firepower. </p>
<p>
We should forgive every lawmaker who will go on the record as saying
they refuse to support gun control because of the zombie threat.
Otherwise, it’s pretty inexcusable. </p>
<div class="">
</div>
</div>
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<br><a href="mailto:art.deco.studios@gmail.com" target="_blank">art.deco.studios@gmail.com</a><br><br><img src="http://users.moscow.com/waf/WP%20Fox%2001.jpg"><br>
</div>