<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
It could be obvious to folks on the viz that your reading comprehension skills are far superior to mine, but must you lord that over me? JEESH!<br><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div><hr id="stopSpelling">CC: jampot@roadrunner.com; bear@moscow.com; vision2020@moscow.com<br>From: thansen@moscow.com<br>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] And just something to think about......<br>Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:39:13 -0800<br>To: scooterd408@hotmail.com<br><br><div>No, Mr. dredge. I DID NOT liken the criminalization of the manufacture of semi-automatic weapons to banning abortion or prohibition. I created an analogy of YOUR suggested compensation to gun manufacturers of semi-automatic weapons and compensating abortion physicians' loss of potential revenue.</div><div><br></div><div>It is an analogy concerning compensation that YOU BROUGHT UP!</div><div><br></div><div>FYI: My proposal, that you feel you so craftily discredited, is the very same proposal that Senator Feinstein will submit, in the form of a bill, before the U.S. Senate in January.</div><div><br></div><div>JEESH! You really are struggling with sixth-grade English comprehension, huh?<br><br><div>Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .</div><div><br></div><div>"Moscow Cares"</div><div><a href="http://www.MoscowCares.com" target="_blank">http://www.MoscowCares.com</a></div><div> </div><div><div>Tom Hansen</div><div>Moscow, Idaho</div><div> </div></div></div><div><br>On Dec 23, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Scott Dredge <<a href="mailto:scooterd408@hotmail.com">scooterd408@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote><div>
<style><!--
.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P
{padding:0px;}
.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage
{font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma;}
--></style>
<div dir="ltr">
Tom,<br><br>Since you're only one so far on v2020 who has suggested enacting laws that ban '<span style="">manufacture and/or possession of semi-automatic rifles and high </span><span style="">capacity ammunition magazines'</span> and further have now likened such bans to 1) the 'banning of abortion' (which has already been tried and failed) and, 2) the 'prohibition of alcohol' (a ban which was 100% constitutionally bullet proof and yet somehow no longer is in place), can you perhaps connect the dots with your own parallels to see the end game of your ban proposal?<br><br>Joe - should we now eliminate Tom' proposal along with the NRA's and move on to some other ideas? Or should both of these still be kept on the table for further vetting?<br><br>-Scott<br><br><div><div id="ecxSkyDrivePlaceholder"></div><hr id="ecxstopSpelling">CC: <a href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">jampot@roadrunner.com</a>; <a href="mailto:bear@moscow.com">bear@moscow.com</a>; <a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>From: <a href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">thansen@moscow.com</a><br>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] And just something to think about......<br>Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:47:59 -0800<br>To: <a href="mailto:scooterd408@hotmail.com">scooterd408@hotmail.com</a><br><br><div>What I am simply stating is that, if manufacture of semi-automatic weapons is criminalized, gun manufacturers of semi-automatic weapons should not be compensated for loss of potential revenue. That is where the analogy begins and ends.</div><div><br></div><div>Should physicians who perform abortions be compensated for loss of potential revenue if Roe v. Wade is overturned?</div><div><br><div>Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .</div><div><br></div><div>"Moscow Cares"</div><div><a href="http://www.MoscowCares.com" target="_blank">http://www.MoscowCares.com</a></div><div> </div><div><div>Tom Hansen</div><div>Moscow, Idaho</div><div> </div></div></div><div><br>On Dec 23, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Scott Dredge <<a href="mailto:scooterd408@hotmail.com">scooterd408@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote><div>
<style><!--
.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P
{padding:0px;}
.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage
{font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma;}
--></style>
<div dir="ltr">
<span style=""><Those companies will simply have to increase manufacture
of legal firearms. No compensation. (I feel fairly certain that
taverns and alcohol producers were not compensated when prohibition
became law).</span>><br><br>Tom - are you deadly serious about this or is your parallel to prohibition intended to be a gutbustingly funny joke. If the latter, I'll echo Sunil's 'bravo'.<br><br>-Scott<br><br><div><div id="ecxSkyDrivePlaceholder"></div><hr id="ecxstopSpelling">CC: <a href="mailto:scooterd408@hotmail.com">scooterd408@hotmail.com</a>; <a href="mailto:bear@moscow.com">bear@moscow.com</a>; <a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>From: <a href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">thansen@moscow.com</a><br>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] And just something to think about......<br>Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:06:12 -0800<br>To: <a href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">jampot@roadrunner.com</a><br><br><div><div><font style="">1. Were you planning on compensating the owners of all of the legally purchased firearms, magazines and associated accessories?</font></div><div><font style=""><br></font></div><div><font style="">No.</font></div><div><font style=""><br></font></div><div><font style="">-------------------------------</font></div><div><span style=""> </span></div><div><span style="">2. What are your plans for all the companies that you plan on putting out of business? I can think of two dozen manufactures just off the top of my head, I'm sure there are more.</span></div><div><span style="">Lets not forget sporting goods stores and ammunition makers. I assume that you will be compensating these owners/stockholders for their loss.</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">Those companies will simply have to increase manufacture of legal firearms. No compensation. (I feel fairly certain that taverns and alcohol producers were not compensated when prohibition became law).</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">The criminalization of high capacity ammunition magazines does NOT criminalize possession of ammunition.</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">-------------------------------</span></div><div><span style=""> </span></div><div><span style="">3. What will you criminalize, do away with, make illegal when the next tragedy occurs with a shotgun (like yours) or a 10 round or less handgun?</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">The criminalization, concerning weapons, is limited to manufacture and/or possession of semi-automatic rifles and high </span><span style="">capacity ammunition magazines. </span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">-------------------------------</span></div><div><span style=""> </span></div><div><span style="">4. What do you propose be done with all the newly created felons who refuse to obey such a blatantly unconstitutional edict?</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">Charge them and prosecute them.</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">-------------------------------</span></div><div><span style=""> </span></div><div><font style="">5. Are you struck by the irony that every time someone like you seriously proposes measures such as these gun sales and NRA memberships climb precipitously?</font></div><div><font style=""><br></font></div><div><font style="">No.</font></div><div><font style=""><br></font></div><div><font style=""><span style="">-------------------------------</span></font></div><br><div style="">Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .</div><div style=""><br></div><div style="">"Moscow Cares"</div><div style=""><a href="http://www.MoscowCares.com" target="_blank">http://www.MoscowCares.com</a></div><div style=""> </div><div style=""><div>Tom Hansen</div><div>Moscow, Idaho</div><div> </div></div></div><div style=""><br>On Dec 22, 2012, at 7:36 PM, "Gary Crabtree" <<a href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">jampot@roadrunner.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote style=""><div><font face="Calibri">1. Were you planning on compensating the owners of all
of the legally purchased firearms, magazines and associated accessories? Where
will that money come from?</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Calibri">2. What are your plans for all the companies that you
plan on putting out of business? I can think of two dozen manufactures just off
the top of my head, I'm sure there are more.</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri">Lets not forget sporting goods stores and ammunition
makers. I assume that you will be compensating these owners/stockholders for
their loss.</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Calibri">3. What will you criminalize, do away with, make illegal
when the next tragedy occurs with a shotgun (like yours) or a 10 round or less
handgun? </font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Calibri">4. What do you propose be done with all
the newly created felons who refuse to obey such a blatantly unconstitutional
edict?</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Calibri">5. Are you struck by the irony that every time
someone like you seriously proposes measures such as these gun sales and
NRA memberships climb precipitously?</font></div></blockquote></div> </div>
</div></blockquote></div> </div>
</div></blockquote></div> </div></body>
</html>