<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>What I am simply stating is that, if manufacture of semi-automatic weapons is criminalized, gun manufacturers of semi-automatic weapons should not be compensated for loss of potential revenue. That is where the analogy begins and ends.</div><div><br></div><div>Should physicians who perform abortions be compensated for loss of potential revenue if Roe v. Wade is overturned?</div><div><br><div>Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .</div><div><br></div><div>"Moscow Cares"</div><div><a href="http://www.MoscowCares.com">http://www.MoscowCares.com</a></div><div> </div><div><div>Tom Hansen</div><div>Moscow, Idaho</div><div> </div></div></div><div><br>On Dec 23, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Scott Dredge <<a href="mailto:scooterd408@hotmail.com">scooterd408@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
<div dir="ltr">
<span style=""><Those companies will simply have to increase manufacture
of legal firearms. No compensation. (I feel fairly certain that
taverns and alcohol producers were not compensated when prohibition
became law).</span>><br><br>Tom - are you deadly serious about this or is your parallel to prohibition intended to be a gutbustingly funny joke. If the latter, I'll echo Sunil's 'bravo'.<br><br>-Scott<br><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div><hr id="stopSpelling">CC: <a href="mailto:scooterd408@hotmail.com">scooterd408@hotmail.com</a>; <a href="mailto:bear@moscow.com">bear@moscow.com</a>; <a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>From: <a href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">thansen@moscow.com</a><br>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] And just something to think about......<br>Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:06:12 -0800<br>To: <a href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">jampot@roadrunner.com</a><br><br><div><div><font style="">1. Were you planning on compensating the owners of all of the legally purchased firearms, magazines and associated accessories?</font></div><div><font style=""><br></font></div><div><font style="">No.</font></div><div><font style=""><br></font></div><div><font style="">-------------------------------</font></div><div><span style=""> </span></div><div><span style="">2. What are your plans for all the companies that you plan on putting out of business? I can think of two dozen manufactures just off the top of my head, I'm sure there are more.</span></div><div><span style="">Lets not forget sporting goods stores and ammunition makers. I assume that you will be compensating these owners/stockholders for their loss.</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">Those companies will simply have to increase manufacture of legal firearms. No compensation. (I feel fairly certain that taverns and alcohol producers were not compensated when prohibition became law).</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">The criminalization of high capacity ammunition magazines does NOT criminalize possession of ammunition.</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">-------------------------------</span></div><div><span style=""> </span></div><div><span style="">3. What will you criminalize, do away with, make illegal when the next tragedy occurs with a shotgun (like yours) or a 10 round or less handgun?</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">The criminalization, concerning weapons, is limited to manufacture and/or possession of semi-automatic rifles and high </span><span style="">capacity ammunition magazines. </span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">-------------------------------</span></div><div><span style=""> </span></div><div><span style="">4. What do you propose be done with all the newly created felons who refuse to obey such a blatantly unconstitutional edict?</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">Charge them and prosecute them.</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">-------------------------------</span></div><div><span style=""> </span></div><div><font style="">5. Are you struck by the irony that every time someone like you seriously proposes measures such as these gun sales and NRA memberships climb precipitously?</font></div><div><font style=""><br></font></div><div><font style="">No.</font></div><div><font style=""><br></font></div><div><font style=""><span style="">-------------------------------</span></font></div><br><div style="">Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .</div><div style=""><br></div><div style="">"Moscow Cares"</div><div style=""><a href="http://www.MoscowCares.com" target="_blank">http://www.MoscowCares.com</a></div><div style=""> </div><div style=""><div>Tom Hansen</div><div>Moscow, Idaho</div><div> </div></div></div><div style=""><br>On Dec 22, 2012, at 7:36 PM, "Gary Crabtree" <<a href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">jampot@roadrunner.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote style=""><div><font face="Calibri">1. Were you planning on compensating the owners of all
of the legally purchased firearms, magazines and associated accessories? Where
will that money come from?</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Calibri">2. What are your plans for all the companies that you
plan on putting out of business? I can think of two dozen manufactures just off
the top of my head, I'm sure there are more.</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri">Lets not forget sporting goods stores and ammunition
makers. I assume that you will be compensating these owners/stockholders for
their loss.</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Calibri">3. What will you criminalize, do away with, make illegal
when the next tragedy occurs with a shotgun (like yours) or a 10 round or less
handgun? </font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Calibri">4. What do you propose be done with all
the newly created felons who refuse to obey such a blatantly unconstitutional
edict?</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Calibri">5. Are you struck by the irony that every time
someone like you seriously proposes measures such as these gun sales and
NRA memberships climb precipitously?</font></div></blockquote></div> </div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>