The problem is this: Beliefs determine values and behavior.<br><br>Hence it is important that that beliefs be as accurate as possible. We don't successfully send people to the moon based on fantasy, untested, and/or untestable theories. Nor do we inject people with various serums to prevent and/or cure disease successfully based on fantasy, untested, or untestable theories. Etc.<br>
<br>How do we find successful values/behaviors to solve problems, including social issues? By considering relevant declarative statements as knowledge claims and insisting on evidence that can be tested and retested be provided to support those claims.<br>
<br>There are always alternative theories, especially about social issues. However cumbersome, and sometimes with many missteps, demanding the testing of knowledge claims generally winnows out the ones in error.<br><br>There are a multitude of various religions and sects of the same religion world. Each inconsistent with each other in significant ways. Each has some very adamant adherents who believe their view of the world is correct, and those work, sometimes violently, to proscribe the behavior of all the rest of us. <br>
<br>Currently, the issue of whether to legalize marriage between couples of the same gender is an example of a particular set of religious persons attempting to proscribe the behavior of all based on their interpretation of and their belief in the truth of the ancient writings to which they subscribe.<br>
<br>The problem, of course, is that so far there has been no successful method to determine which, if any, of the multitude of religious beliefs are true. The inference among others is that if there is a benevolent god, why is it keeping the truth so unfathomable and unclear. Another inference is that the untestable is hardly a successful solution to practical behavioral issues/problems.<br>
<br>As a nonbeliever, I strive to base my behavioral decisions based on as accurate knowledge claims as possible. I resent being told what I can do, and resent what others are told what to do based on what can most charitably be called in the starkness of requiring knowledge claims to be supported merely religious fantasies and superstitions.<br>
<br>I believe that this position is similar to most nonbelievers.<br><br>Why do I harp on it? Take the above and add:<br><br>"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." --Wendall Phillips<br><br>Failing to express the problems of religious belief and the problems of such that plague humankind is the same as tacitly approving the dictatorship of untestable and harmful fantasies. <br>
<br>w.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Scott Dredge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:scooterd408@hotmail.com" target="_blank">scooterd408@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div dir="ltr">
The God Damned Atheists can be more annoying than Fundys. I think
anyone who tries to push their religion (or lack thereof) on anyone else
is a complete phony. If you really believe in God (or don't) you
should be secure in that belief such that you don't need to convince
anyone else of this. If you're an atheist only you know what's in your
heart, otherwise only you and God know what's in your heart.<br><br><div><div></div><hr>Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:08:54 -0700<br>From: <a href="mailto:art.deco.studios@gmail.com" target="_blank">art.deco.studios@gmail.com</a><br>
To: <a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com" target="_blank">vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>Subject: [Vision2020] About Evidence<div><div class="h5"><br><br><h1>Atheism and Critical Thinking (Video)</h1><a href="http://www.printfriendly.com/print/v2?url=http://mysticpolitics.com/atheism-and-critical-thinking-video/" target="_blank">http://mysticpolitics.com/atheism-and-critical-thinking-video/</a><div>
July 17, 2012</div>
<b>A series of videos from UK artist and secular humanist <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/QualiaSoup" target="_blank">QualiaSoup</a> discussing critical thinking, science, philosophy and the natural world.</b><br>
Part 1 – <b>The burden of proof</b>; Makers of supernatural claims have an inescapable burden of proof.<br>
<p>Part 2 - <b>Lack of belief in gods</b>; Explaining the concept, refuting common objections and giving a number of reasons that atheists are sometimes ‘fervent’.</p>
<p>Part 3 - <b>Critical Thinking</b>; A look at some of the principles of critical thinking.</p>
<p>Part 4 - <b>Putting faith in its place</b>; Faith has no place demanding agreement or punishing disagreement.</p>
<p>Part 5 - <b>Open-mindedness</b>; A look at some of
the flawed thinking that prompts people who believe in certain
non-scientific concepts to advise others who don’t to be more
open-minded.</p>
<p>Part 6 - <b>Arguing with ghosts</b>; A brief look at the pointless exercise of telling people, rather than asking them, what they believe.</p>
<p>Part 7 - <b>It *could* just be coincidence</b>; This video shows how probability theory is sufficient to explain even seemingly remarkable coincidences.</p>
<p>Part 8 - <b>Skewed views of science</b>; A look at the pitfalls of arguing against science from incomprehension or emotion.</p>
<p>Part 9 - <b>The faith cake</b>; This video challenges the claim that a belief in science requires equal faith to the belief in a god.</p>
<p>Part 10 - <b>In the beginning, God created injustice</b>; The impossible situation of Adam and Eve, and the unjust treatment they suffered from the ‘merciful and loving’ god.</p>
Part 11 - <b>Hell: an excessive punishment</b>; Some believe atheists deserve an infinitely grislier fate than this, simply for doubting the existence of a being that doesn’t openly present itself. I’ve always been curious about that.<br>
<br>________________________<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<br><a href="mailto:art.deco.studios@gmail.com" target="_blank">art.deco.studios@gmail.com</a><br><br><img src=""><br>
<br>
<br></div></div>=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.net</a>
mailto:<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" target="_blank">Vision2020@moscow.com</a>
=======================================================</div> </div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<br><a href="mailto:art.deco.studios@gmail.com" target="_blank">art.deco.studios@gmail.com</a><br><br><img src="http://users.moscow.com/waf/WP%20Fox%2001.jpg"><br>
<br>