<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:tahoma, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto">Of course science is questioned, that is how it gains evidence and is tested. But it is the questions by other scientists that matter and either support or disprove a theory. Paul is not another scientist. His remarks or counter claims do nothing to support or disprove a theory. </SPAN></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto"></SPAN> </div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto">My claim that light does not travel at 186,200 miles per second has no barring. Even if I claim I have the proof, as I do not have the training, education, equipment for experiments, and probably not even the intelligence to make such a claim. So neither does Paul's that he has proof that other scientists are wrong about global warming<VAR id=yui-ie-cursor></VAR>. He has no standing. To claim otherwise is to claim I also have the right to declare light does not travel at the speed other scientists claim it does. To think or defend otherwise is foolish. </SPAN></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto"></SPAN> </div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto">Donovan J. Arnold</SPAN></div>
<div><BR></div>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: tahoma, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: 0; MARGIN: 5px 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; HEIGHT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 0px; BORDER-TOP: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 0px" class=hr contentEditable=false readonly="true"></DIV><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Kenneth Marcy <kmmos1@frontier.com><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> Vision2020 discussions <vision2020@moscow.com> <BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:01 AM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Re: [Vision2020] Oktoberfest (was: heat wave)<BR></FONT></DIV><BR>On 7/10/2012 8:55 PM, lfalen wrote:<BR><[snip]><BR>> Work on the problem is (sic) a calm reasonable manner. Science in general have (sic) lots of view points. The teutonic Plate theory was originally ridiculed as was the
the (sic) effect of glaciers on land formation. There has (sic) been lots of conflicting reports on Vitamins and Herbs.<BR>Roger may be onto something here that does require some research. The Germans have raised many questions over the years, and not all of them have been answered. Concerning plate theory, for example, there are many questions concerning optimal plate contents and the best methods for moving them around.<BR><BR>Here is a list of potential research topics, which undoubtedly would be well-supplemented by appropriate liquid flows under optimal temperature conditions.<BR><BR>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_German_dishes<BR><BR>Perhaps with the arrival of closer-to-optimal temperatures, say October, some serious research projects might commence to gather further data.<BR><BR>Suggestions for optimal combinations of plate contents and flowing liquids are
welcome.<BR><BR><BR>Ken<BR><BR>=======================================================<BR>List services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<BR> http://www.fsr.net<BR> mailto:<A href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" ymailto="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>=======================================================<BR><BR><BR></DIV></DIV></div></body></html>