<div class="header">
<div class="left">
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/"><img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif" alt="The New York Times" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="0"></a>
</div>
<div class="right">
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/printer-friendly&pos=Position1&sn2=336c557e/4f3dd5d2&sn1=2917f10a/fabfffff&camp=FSL2012_ArticleTools_120x60_1787507c_nyt5&ad=BOSW_120x60_May22_NoText&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ewelcometothebathtub%2Ecom" target="_blank">
<br></a>
</div>
</div>
<br clear="all"><hr align="left" size="1">
<div class="timestamp">June 4, 2012</div>
<h1>Vatican Scolds Nun for Book on Sexuality</h1>
<span><h6 class="byline">By <a rel="author" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/g/laurie_goodstein/index.html" title="More Articles by Laurie Goodstein" class="meta-per">LAURIE GOODSTEIN</a> and <a rel="author" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/d/rachel_donadio/index.html" title="More Articles by Rachel Donadio" class="meta-per">RACHEL DONADIO</a></h6>
</span>
<div id="articleBody">
<p>
The <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/r/roman_catholic_church/index.html?inline=nyt-org" title="More articles about the Roman Catholic Church." class="meta-org">Vatican</a>’s
doctrinal office on Monday denounced an American nun who taught
Christian ethics at Yale Divinity School for a book that attempted to
present a theological rationale for same-sex relationships, masturbation
and remarriage after divorce. </p>
<p>
The Vatican office, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, said
that the book, “Just Love: A Framework for Christian Sexual Ethics,” by
Sister Margaret A. Farley, was “not consistent with authentic Catholic
theology,” and should not be used by Roman Catholics. </p>
<p>
Sister Farley, a past president of the <a href="http://www.ctsa-online.org/">Catholic Theological Society of America </a>and an award-winning scholar, responded in <a href="http://notesfromthequad.yale.edu/statement-margaret-farley">a statement</a>:
“I can only clarify that the book was not intended to be an expression
of current official Catholic teaching, nor was it aimed specifically
against this teaching. It is of a different genre altogether.” </p>
<p>
The book, she said, offers “contemporary interpretations” of justice and
fairness in human sexual relations, moving away from a “taboo morality”
and drawing on “present-day scientific, philosophical, theological, and
biblical resources.” </p>
<p>
The formal censure comes only weeks after the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/us/vatican-reprimands-us-nuns-group.html?_r=1">stinging reprimand</a>
of the main coordinating group of American nuns, prompting many
Catholics across the country to turn out in defense of the nuns with
protests, petitions and vigils. </p>
<p>
The nuns’ organization, the <a href="https://lcwr.org/">Leadership Conference of Women Religious</a>,
said on Friday that its board had declared that the Vatican’s
accusations were “unsubstantiated,” and that it was sending its leaders
to Rome to make its case. Three bishops have been appointed by the
Vatican to supervise an overhaul of the nuns’ organization. </p>
<p>
The censure of Sister Farley, who belongs to the <a href="http://www.sistersofmercy.org/">Sisters of Mercy of the Americas</a>,
is the second time recently that a book by an American nun has been
denounced by the church’s hierarchy. In 2011, the doctrine committee of
United States bishops condemned “Quest for the Living God: Mapping
Frontiers in the Theology of God,” by Sister Elizabeth A. Johnson, a
professor of theology at Fordham University in New York. </p>
<p>
The Vatican’s doctrinal office, led by an American, Cardinal William J.
Levada, has spent more than two years reviewing Sister Farley’s book,
which was published in 2006. The office first notified Sister Farley’s
superior of its concerns in March 2010, and said it had opened a further
investigation because a response she had sent to the Vatican in October
2010 had not been “satisfactory.” It said her book had “been a cause of
confusion among the faithful.” </p>
<p>
The dean of Yale Divinity School, Harold W. Attridge, a Catholic layman,
and the president of the Sisters of Mercy, Sister Patricia McDermott,
issued statements in support of Sister Farley. So did 15 fellow scholars
who, in a document released by the divinity school, testified to Sister
Farley’s Catholic credentials and the influence she has had in the
field of moral theology. </p>
<p>
Cardinal Levada’s statement about the book, dated March 30 but released
on Monday, said that it “cannot be used as a valid expression of
Catholic teaching, either in counseling and formation, or in ecumenical
and interreligious dialogue.” Pope Benedict XVI approved the statement’s
contents and ordered its publication, it said. The statement comes as
the Vatican struggles to contain a controversy over leaked documents
that showed infighting and mismanagement in the papacy of Benedict XVI,
who on Sunday concluded a three-day meeting in Milan to promote family
values. </p>
<p>
The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said the Vatican had
not called for any sanctions against Sister Farley and was not expected
to do so because she has retired from teaching. </p>
<p>
Sister Farley’s book finds moral and theological justifications for <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/same_sex_marriage/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about Same-Sex Marriage, Civil Unions, and Domestic Partnerships." class="meta-classifier">same-sex marriage</a>,
which aside from abortion, has become the major galvanizing political
and moral issue for American bishops. The statement took Sister Farley
to task for writing that same-sex marriage “can also be important in
transforming the hatred, rejection, and stigmatization of gays and
lesbians.” She wrote that “same-sex relationships and activities can be
justified according to the same sexual ethic as heterosexual
relationships and activities.” </p>
<p>
“This opinion is not acceptable,” the Vatican statement said. The
Catechism of the Catholic Church, it said, says homosexual acts are
“acts of grave depravity” that are “intrinsically disordered” and
“contrary to the natural law.” It said that Sister Farley’s assertion
that sometimes divorce is a reasonable option for couples who have grown
apart contradicted church teaching on the “indissolubility of
marriage.” </p>
<p>
The statement quoted liberally from some of the racier passages in “Just
Love,” including ones in which Sister Farley writes that female
masturbation “usually does not raise any moral questions at all.” She
adds that “many women” have found “great good in self-pleasuring —
perhaps especially in the discovery of their own possibilities for
pleasure — something many had not experienced or even known about in
their ordinary sexual relations with husbands or lovers.” </p>
<p>
The Vatican said this assessment contradicted church teaching that “the
deliberate use of the sexual faculty, for whatever reason, outside of
marriage is essentially contrary to its purpose.” </p>
<div class="authorIdentification">
<p>Gaia Pianigiani contributed reporting.</p> </div>
<div class="articleCorrection">
</div>
</div>
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<br><a href="mailto:art.deco.studios@gmail.com" target="_blank">art.deco.studios@gmail.com</a><br>