<div class="header">
<div class="left">
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/"><img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif" alt="The New York Times" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="0"></a>
</div>
<div class="right">
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/printer-friendly&pos=Position1&sn2=336c557e/4f3dd5d2&sn1=ea131c6c/ca95792e&camp=FSL2012_ArticleTools_120x60_1787506c_nyt5&ad=RubySparks_Apr20_120x60_noText&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Frubysparks" target="_blank">
<br></a>
</div>
</div>
<br clear="all"><hr align="left" size="1">
<div class="timestamp">May 18, 2012</div>
<h1>It’s Their Party</h1>
<span><h6 class="byline">By <a rel="author" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/gailcollins/index.html?inline=nyt-per" title="More Articles by Gail Collins" class="meta-per">GAIL COLLINS</a></h6>
</span>
<div id="articleBody">
<p>
Our subject for today is: Presidential nominating conventions — why are they still around? </p>
<p>
Other possible subjects were: The Facebook phenomenon and why does its
board of directors look like a reunion tour of the Backstreet Boys and
their managers? </p>
<p>
Or: The new sensation of dancing dogs on TV talent shows and how many of
them do you think were ever made to ride on the roof of a car? </p>
<p>
But, no, I think we should go with the conventions. The Republicans are
having theirs in Tampa, Fla., in August and then the Democrats will be
in Charlotte, N.C., at the beginning of September. The presidential
nominees have been chosen, but there’s still a lot to look forward to.
The speeches! The funny hats! And, um ... </p>
<p>
Little-known factoids about the upcoming conventions: </p>
<p>
• The Democrats have an official barbecue sauce. Actually, three. You
can buy them on the official Web site, along with a bunch of T-shirts
and a very fetching oven mitt. </p>
<p>
• The Republican National Convention says that it is expecting 13,000 to
15,000 members of the news media, which would make it “the single
largest media event in the world except for the Olympic Games.” The
convention should try to use this Olympic theme more extensively,
perhaps decking out all the potential vice presidential nominees in
Speedos and recounting heartwarming stories involving ailing family
members who are rooting for them back home. </p>
<p>
• The governor of Florida has rejected Tampa’s attempt to ban the
carrying of concealed weapons downtown during the Republican convention.
I guess this is one way to ratchet up excitement, but I’d prefer Donald
Trump nominated for vice president. </p>
<p>
• You, the taxpayer, are paying the bill. Yes! Back in the 1970s, after a
Watergate scandal involving lobbyists who traded huge donations to the
Republican convention for special favors from the Nixon administration,
Congress passed a law providing federal funding. Indexed for inflation,
it’s now about $18 million per. </p>
<p>
“It’s the one part of the public funding program both parties seem more
than happy to accept,” said Anthony Corrado, a professor of government
at Colby College and an expert on the financing of political
conventions. (Isn’t it reassuring that there are people struggling to
get the country worried about presidential nominating convention
finances? It reminds me of the year I was in charge of making it fun to
read about the New York City Charter Revision Commission.) </p>
<p>
The parties swear, when they take the cash, that they won’t solicit
additional contributions. But in American politics, when there’s a law
against raising money you want to raise, the answer is: </p>
<p>
A) Break the law. </p>
<p>
B) Find a crazy billionaire. </p>
<p>
C) Form a committee. </p>
<p>
Option C wins! The cities that want to be a convention site create
committees, which promise to raise copious cash if chosen. The host
committee in Charlotte, for instance, is pledged to raise $36.65
million. </p>
<p>
This is turning into something of a struggle, particularly since the
Democrats, in a little-noted reform effort, prohibited the host
committee from accepting donations above $100,000, or money from
lobbyists or corporations. (The Republicans will pretty much take
anything from anybody.) Instantly, like a daffodil in spring, a new
committee popped up in Charlotte, called New American City. Its mission
is to “showcase all that the city and region has to offer” during the
convention and, of course, it has none of those irksome limitations.
</p>
<p>
While they were banning corporate contributions, the Democrats also
reduced this year’s convention to three days from the usual four.
However, the eliminated day will be turned over to a celebration at the
Charlotte Motor Speedway, during which viewers will have the opportunity
to note the close ties between the Democratic Party and Nascar dads.
And since it is happening before the official opening gavel, it can be
paid for by New American City. </p>
<p>
Do not tell me that this country has lost its capacity for innovation. </p>
<p>
In a sane world, the conventions could run one day and $18 million would
be plenty. They could skip almost everything but the speeches by the
candidates, and President Obama will actually leave the convention to
make his at Charlotte’s unfortunately-named Bank of America Stadium.
</p>
<p>
Why do they stretch it out? Well, there are a lot of politicians out
there yearning for a chance to address an empty auditorium at 2 o’clock
in the afternoon. And our public officials have to deal with an endless
line of really irritating people who are impossible to make happy. A
convention is a mound of favors they can do for their special interests —
a party invitation, a seat in the vicinity of Joe Biden, or just the
opportunity to mingle on the floor with the South Dakota delegation.
(Good hats!) If it wasn’t for the need to treat the monied troops, the
Republicans could hold their convention at Mitt Romney’s vacation house.
Which I hear is much more pleasant than Tampa in late August. </p>
<div class="articleCorrection">
</div>
</div>
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<br><a href="mailto:art.deco.studios@gmail.com" target="_blank">art.deco.studios@gmail.com</a><br>