<div class="header">
<div class="left">
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/"><img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif" alt="The New York Times" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="0" align="left"></a></div><br></div>
<br clear="all"><hr size="1" align="left">
<div class="timestamp">February 23, 2012</div>
<h1>Donors With Agendas</h1>
<div id="articleBody">
<p>
The presidential primary season is being brought to you by a handful of
multimillionaires and companies who have propped up the candidates with
enormous donations to their “super PACs.” Just<a title="NYT graphic" href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/01/31/us/politics/super-pac-donors.html"> <font style="color:rgb(255,0,0)" size="6"><b>two dozen or so individuals</b></font></a>,
couples and companies have given more than <font size="6"><b style="color:rgb(255,0,0)">80 percent</b></font> of the money
collected by super PACs, or $54 million, according to disclosure forms
released on Monday. </p>
<p>
Freed of nearly all regulations or good sense by Citizens United and
other court decisions, the super PACs are raising money in ludicrously
large sums. The $10 million from Sheldon and Miriam Adelson to Winning
Our Future, which has sustained Newt Gingrich’s trailing campaign, is
the biggest single donation to a candidate. But every candidate now has
his own millionaire supporter, and the concentration of wealth in the
campaign is growing. </p>
<p>
The people writing these outsize checks are committed to defeating
President Obama, but their interests don’t stop there. Many are involved
in businesses or ideological causes that have clear policy agendas with
the federal government. Their huge influence on individual candidates
demonstrates the potential for corruption inherent in the super PAC era.
Among the biggest givers: </p>
<p>
¶Harold Simmons, a billionaire corporate raider, has given $1 million to
Mr. Gingrich’s political action committee, $1.1 million to Rick Perry’s
PAC, $100,000 to Mitt Romney’s PAC, and $10 million to American
Crossroads, the super PAC advised by Karl Rove that is supporting many
Republican candidates. Mr. Simmons’s companies make metals, paints and
chemicals, among other things, and have gotten into trouble over lead
and uranium emissions from previous decades. He also runs a radioactive
waste dump in Texas that has clashed with environmental regulators over
its proximity to a nearby aquifer. He controls Waste Control
Specialists, which has contracts to clean up federal hazardous waste
sites, including emissions from other companies he controls. </p>
<p>
¶Peter Thiel, a co-founder of PayPal and an outspoken libertarian, gave $2.6 million to Ron Paul’s PAC. In 2009, <a title="Cato Institute blog" href="http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/04/13/peter-thiel/the-education-of-a-libertarian/">he wrote</a>
that the 1920s were the last decade when one could be optimistic about
American politics, lamenting the subsequent rise of the welfare state
that he blamed in part on giving women the right to vote. </p>
<p>
¶Foster Friess, who gave $1 million to Rick Santorum’s Red White and
Blue PAC, is a mutual fund manager who recently declared that aspirin
used to be an effective contraceptive when women put it between their
knees. He is a former president of the Council for National Policy, <a title="NYT report" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/28/politics/campaign/28conserve.html">a secretive club</a>
of some of the country’s most powerful conservatives, which opposes
unions, same-sex marriage and government regulation. </p>
<p>
In addition, six-figure checks were given to Mr. Romney by seven
executives at hedge funds or investment firms. Leaders of this industry
are interested in fewer regulations and a low tax rate for their type of
income. </p>
<p>
President Obama’s super PAC, Priorities USA Action, received only two
seven-figure checks last year, one from the Service Employees
International Union for $1 million, and one from the movie executive
Jeffrey Katzenberg for $2 million. (Mr. Katzenberg said last month that
he was disappointed with Mr. Obama’s opposition to antipiracy
legislation but would continue to raise money for him.) </p>
<p>
Until a few weeks ago, the president might have credibly campaigned
against the undue influence of special interests on his Republican
rivals. He can no longer make the case because, after his PAC received
only $58,816 last month, Mr. Obama invited donors to give without
limits. And all but the most privileged Americans will pay the price if
the nation’s wealthiest can buy elections. </p>
<div class="articleCorrection">
</div>
</div>
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)<br><a href="mailto:art.deco.studios@gmail.com" target="_blank">art.deco.studios@gmail.com</a><br>